Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Burmese Refugee Leaders Talk about Recent Developments in Burma

Guest post by Hiram Ruiz, DCF’s Director of Refugee Services. He will be contributing a series of blog posts over the next week detailing his trip to Asia, where he is spending time with refugees.

 

The Burmese have not had basic human rights for many decades, leading to hundreds of thousands of Burmese fleeing their country. However, in the past few months Burma’s military rulers have taken steps towards democracy and political reform.
They freed revered opposition figure Aung San Suu Kyi from her years-long house arrest, permitted elections that elected her to Parliament, and allowed her to leave the country on a trip that included a stop to receive the Nobel Peace Prize.  Suu Kyi also paid a brief but historic visit to Mae La refugee camp in Thailand.
Hiram showing photos of Burmese refugees in Florida to the Mae La camp Refugee Committee Leader.

Burmese refugees in Mae La and other camps are closely following developments in their homeland and wondering what the implications are for them.  Is the change real?  Is the Burmese military really going to permit further democratic reform?  Even if there is real change in Rangoon, the capital, will the Burmese military end its decades-long repression of ethnic minorities?  Or is it all a façade?
The answers to these questions will determine the refugees’ future.  If democracy takes hold in Burma and the government allows ethnic minorities to live freely, the refugees may be able to finally return home.  But what if the apparent change in not genuine?  And what impact will current developments in Burma have on the U.S. and other countries’ plans for future resettlement of Burmese refugees?
Hiram Ruiz meeting with leaders of the Karen Refugee Women's Asociation
Among the refugee leaders I met in Mae La refugee camp and Mae Sot town were the head of the Karen Refugee Committee in Thailand, the head of the Refugee Committee in Mae La camp, and leaders of the Karen Women’s organization.  Their views varied, though all remain wary.
They welcome the recent developments in Burma, but while some think they offer a glimmer of hope, others believe that the Burmese military is unlikely to end its repression in ethnic minority areas.  Many believe, however, that the international community will continue to respond positively to the Burmese government’s moves (U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton visited Burma recently, the first high-level administration official to do so in many years) and that there will start to be pressure for the refugees to be allowed back into their countries.
Burmese refugee students at work in Mae La camp school
With the eventual closure of the camps now on the horizon, some refugees in the camps who had not made up their minds whether to apply for resettlement to the U.S. or other countries are now beginning to decide.  Even the head of the Refugee Committee in Mae La told me he and his family had applied for resettlement to join relatives in North Carolina.
Resettlement is not an option for most, however.  For some time, the U.S. has only offered resettlement to refugees who have been registered in the camps since 2005 and it is likely that future resettlement to the U.S. will be limited to refugees who have immediate family members already in the United States.
Next post:
At Mae La, I met one young woman already accepted for resettlement in Jacksonville, a family of four who have immediate family in Florida and may be eligible for future resettlement, and a man whose uncle lives in Jacksonville but who is unlikely to qualify for resettlement because he arrived in the camps after 2005 and his uncle is not considered an immediate family member.  

http://blog.myflfamilies.com

No comments:

Post a Comment