Monday, December 16, 2013

Thai University Bestows Honors Dr Cynthia With Doctorate

Dr Cynthia Maung


Her Royal Highness Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn will present Dr Cynthia Maung, the founder of Mae Tao Clinic with a honorary doctoral degree in recognition of her work with refugee and migrant communities on the Thai Burma border.

Ubon Ratchathani University (UBU), Thailand, will present Dr Cynthia Maung, a Karen doctor and founder of the Mae Tao Clinic on the Thai-Burma border with an honorary doctoral degree in Medicine on the 18th December 2013.

Dr. Cynthia spoke to Karen News that the degree was the degree was acknowledgement of the service her staff provided.

“This award shows the value of the healthcare services we provide on the border and of our health workers’ efforts. I am pleased that they are being recognized and encouraged.”

The honorary degree is to be presented by Her Royal Highness Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn.

The award is being given in recognition of Dr Cynthia’s work with Burmese refugees, migrants, and orphans at the Thai-Burmese Border, Mae Tao Clinic said in a statement.

Dr Cynthia said that she hoped to continue her collaboration with Thai health officials.

“We hope in the future, we can continue to coordinate with Thai health organizations.”

Ubon Ratchathani University announced the award in early November and said that Dr. Cynthia would receive in person the honorary degree.

Saw Win Kyaw, a director of the Back Pack Health Worker Team – a community based organization working on healthcare provision along the Thai Burma border – spoke to Karen News about the degree.

“Sayama [Dr Cynthia] provides health care and has treated everyone equally without discrimination. She is a role model [for the health worker]. She is a good example for the Karen people and for all health workers and organizations. She deserves many more honors.”

Dr Cynthia has received more than 20 international awards for her work in health and human rights including the Australia’s Sydney Peace Prize, The One Award of Hong Kong and the Ramon Magsaysay Award of the Philippines for Community Leadership.

Ethnic groups to call on govt to help Chin refugees return home


Chin ethnic groups will send a request to Myanmar government to help Chin and other Myanmar ethnic groups residing abroad as refugees to be able to return home, said Salai Izak Khin, Secretary of Chin National Conference Organizing Committee.

Over one hundred thousand of Chin refugees are currently staying in foreign countries, according to Chin Human Right Organization. About 70,000 of them have taken refuge in India while about 40,000 in Malaysia. Some 500 Chin ethnics are in Thailand, the group earlier reported.

“Refugee issue is the main topic when we discuss ethnic affairs [with the government]. Our region is less developed than the neighbouring states. And, we need human resources for carrying out development tasks. In fact, the refugees are a good source of manpower and we need to call them back. So, we will request the government for them to be able to come back home. This is also the main issue that Chin politics groups will discuss in coming political discussions,” said Salai Izak Khin.

Chin National Conference has urged armed groups and the government to respect human rights of Chin ethnics, Salai Izak Khin added. Poor administration, discrimination and human rights abuses had been the main factors that turned many Chin ethnics into refugees. Peacemaking efforts and resolving conflicts are required to heal the situation, according to Chin National Conference.

“Our request is not only for Chin ethnics but also for all the refugees abroad. Now, we cannot say the political situation isn’t stable, but there are many things that have to be done before 2015. We will make requests to the government step by step. Firstly, our national conference has urged the government to provide necessary protection for Chin ethnic refugees in India,” said Salai Izak Khin.

Saturday, December 14, 2013

: UNHCR : Group Resettlement of Thai Border Refugees to End Early 2014



MAE HONG SON, Northern Thailand — The final deadline for eligible applicants for UN group resettlement to third countries for Burmese refugees on the Thai-Burma border will be sometime in late January 2014, according to the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).

Vivian Tan, the spokeswoman for the UNHCR in Asia, told The Irrawaddy that eight years after the program began in 2005, and with the departure of tens of thousands of refugees to the United States since then, the number of eligible refugees is dwindling.

“The number of refugees expressing interest in this program has decreased in recent years, signaling a natural end to the program,” Tan said.

The United States first announced to camp residents in January 2013 that the group resettlement program for registered refugees would begin wrapping up this year, and a camp in Mae La, Thailand, stopped taking new applicants months ago. The announcement was made at different times in different camps, and each camp was given different deadlines for eligible applicants.

There are more than 130,000 Burmese refugees, mostly ethnic Karen who abandoned their homes in eastern Burma and fled to live in refugee camps on the Thai-Burma border in provinces such as Mae Hong Son, Tak and Sangklaburi. Many refugees have been living in these camps for more than 20 years.

Since the installation of a quasi-civilian government led by President Thein Sein in 2011, peace talks between the government and more than a dozen ethnic minority rebel groups have been a priority of the Thein Sein administration. The peace push has yielded results, with the government signing ceasefire agreements with all but two of the country’s major ethnic armed groups.

But the “peace dividend” for refugees on the Thai-Burma border has taken the form of decreasing humanitarian support amid a growing call by some for the refugees to be repatriated to their homelands.

Tan, however, said that even after the group resettlement program comes to an end, eligible refugees will still be able to express interest in individual resettlement to the United States and other third countries. “Thus, this is not the end of resettlement per se, just the end of the group resettlement program to the US,” she added.

“Eligible refugees are given several months to decide if they wished to avail of the group resettlement option. The US authorities have said the program will continue until they have processed every application received by the deadline for each camp,” said Tan.

However, the US Embassy in Rangoon denied the discontinuation of any resettlement program. According to an official at the embassy, the refugees’ admission program is ongoing and there is no halt to the processing of Burmese refugees.

“In fact the continuation of this program was specifically highlighted, as Burmese refugees continue to constitute one of our largest groups being resettled in the United States,” said the official, who asked for anonymity and did not specify whether the program referred to involved group or individual resettlement.

The official said that for the 2013-14 fiscal year, US President Barack Obama authorized the admission of up to 70,000 refugees from around the world. The top five nationalities resettled to the United States in 2013 were Iraqi, Burmese, Bhutanese, Somali and Cuban.

The United States is one of several countries participating in the program, which according to the UNHCR has so far resettled 80,000 refugees to the United States, Canada, Australia and several European countries as well as Japan.

The Border Consortium (TBC), a non-profit organization that has been providing food aid and shelter to the Burmese refugees for more than 20 years, also expressed concern over the reduction in financial support from international donors.

Mike Bruce, a spokesman for the TBC, said funding for humanitarian assistance has been reduced, with the impact of this manifested in recent ration changes.

“Rice rations are being revised in refugee camps in Thailand following reductions in funding for humanitarian food aid and a transition to needs-based and community-managed humanitarian relief,” said Bruce.

Households in refugee camps on the Thai-Burma border are now categorized as “Most Vulnerable,” “Vulnerable,” “Standard,” or “Self-Reliant.” Standard categorized households have seen a change in the rice provided for adults, and Self-Reliant households no longer receive food assistance for adults over 18 years of age, according to the officer.

In talks with more than a dozen refugees on the Thai-Burma border, The Irrawaddy was told that the shrinking financial support had made day-to-day life more difficult, between the rations cuts and a reduction in construction materials used to repair makeshift homes of bamboo and straw.

Refugees are scrambling to apply for group resettlement ahead of the program’s anticipated termination, they said.

Resettlement in third countries was the most appropriate option for them, refugees said, with uncertainty over what they might return to in Burma making that option less appealing, and their continued existence in the refugee camps made more challenging by dwindling financial support.

Wednesday, December 11, 2013

A Chin Refugee and WKU Student talked on SNAP



Hello,


Thank you for replying. 


If it's alright with you I'd like to ask you a few more questions about your experience with the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) formerly known as Food Stamps. 


First, I want to make sure I'm spelling your name correctly. It is Bernar Dine, correct? 


When I spoke with you briefly you said that you receive $668 in SNAP benefits? How often do you receive this amount? Is it every month?


How does the Supplemental Nutrition Program help your family? Can you give an example of how the recent cuts are impacting your family?


Also, you mentioned that you're expecting another $200 decrease now that you are working. What do you do at the International Center? Do you have any other jobs? Does your wife also work?

Can you tell me more about your past as a refugee? How long have you been living in America?

I want to understand more about how these cuts are a problem for your family. If there is anything you would like to add please do.

I'd like to thank you for answering my questions.


Sincerely,

Western Kentucky University Student


Reply from Cho Chin Refugee to WKU Student


Hi , 


I got your voice message on my office phone when I got back to and thank you for your email again. 

My name is Bernardine from Burma, and I belong to Cho Chin tribes. You might need to learn more about Burmese Ethnic groups if I introduce you myself as Cho Ethnic.

I had been living in Malaysia for 6 years as a refugee with my family till I come to Bowling Green. My family and I were resettled here on 25th May,2013, 6 months ago with the help of International Centre where I am now working with. 

After two weeks of our arrival, we received Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) formerly known as Food Stamps, in total $ 668. We got the benefits till the Government shut down and it was cut off $ 30 out of $ 668. We are still fine. 

This month, I got a letter from Cabinet office to update family incomes, then so , I have to show up all my monthly incomes from International Centre. A few weeks later, I got another letter from SNAP, and it is reported that we will receive $ 316 starting from Jan,14 till June, 14. I believed that they are going to cut off about $ 200 but now more than $ 300. Anyhow, I really appreciate the US government for the supports to Burmese Refugees and I still have something to go.

To be honest, I am really afraid of having a hard time for another six months because it was just fine with what we had before $ 668. The rest of our small incomes, I can spend on domestic material needs. As newcomers, we need almost everything. This is just a start for my family, we left everything behind in Burma and in Malaysia. What I mean is that we, of course, had to depend on SNAP and now I have to spend $ 300 for food out of my monthly incomes and I am very sure I find difficulty to adjust expenses. It was really helpful to my family's sufficiency. 


What do you do at the International Center?

I am working for International Centre as a case manager starting from a month ago and I earn hourly $ 10 and I am not allowed to work more than 8 hours a day. Mostly, I can work only 25- 30 hours per week out of 40 hours. I pay $525 for rent, Gas $ 30, Utility $ 150- 200 and water $40-50. Internet bill $ 60, phone bill $ 50, Car Insurance monthly $ 160, and we have to pay back IOM loans every month $ 115 to USCRI, for air tickets. These are our monthly bills. 

I earn about $ 1100 every month after tax from International Centre. Now we are using Heating and I am not very sure that Utility will increase. 


Do you have any other jobs?

I don't have any other jobs except International Centre but I would be happy if i can find working from home to make extra some incomes to cover the needs of my family. Do let me know if Western Kentucky University has any opportunity to provide working from home or Part-time for refugees. I appreciate it. 


Does your wife also work?

No, She is not working because we having children under age, they go to School. There should be somebody who will pick up the chidren when they are back from school under US law. And also my wife is expecting. 

Can you tell me more about your past as a refugee? How long have you been living in America?

I have already mention above about my experiences as a refugee in Malaysia and I have been here in Bowling Green for 7 months from our arrival. 

To tell a story of my experiences as a refugee in the past would be a very long story but I have a dream to write some of my experiences on my own website but not yet, may be one day. My Refugee Life in Malaysia was something that I say " bad dream or nightmare". We are resettled here is something like, it is ,for us, dawn coming through the midnight.

I run a non-government organization in Malaysia to help my fellow refugees and you may find some informations at www.kchocatholiccommunity.20fr.com. I could not update community webpages and our services but you can still find some information what we were and who we were! 


To add more about refugee in Bowling Green, 

Newly resettled refugee has supports from International Centre till 3 to 6 months, it is a good support but I will say it is not enough for the family. In deed, the family needs support about one year because there are lots of Medical appointments and follow up. We are really in need of transportation assistance, and interpreter services. 

They need more free language providers somewhere refugees can travel or working distance or the best is churches. I personally found that some of refugees lost their hope with what they have come through. 

They need a lot of supports such as community orientation such as US cultures, Living Style, and most important is US Laws. For example, one of Burmese refugees got a fight with his co-worker, that makes him difficult to find another job on his background check. One reported that I didn't understand the US laws and it happened to me. What a pity story! Most refugees are very stressful now and in the past they have come through. Though most people those who are working for refugees, they cannot understand them because they cannot see what was their experiences. I am questioned for many times " What is refugee ? and Where is Burma?

Please feel free to contact me if my answer doesn't meet your points. I would be happy if you have any suggestion or points of views for me. Thank you. 

With best regards,
Bernardine Cho Lam Naing
Myanmar Refugee International

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

Life gets tougher on the Thailand-Myanmar border


A refugee child waits to be treated at the Mae Tao clinic in Mae Sot, Tak province, on the border with Myanmar. Rations for refugees have been cut this month, sparking fears for the health of more vulnerable residents of the camps.
A refugee child waits to be treated at the Mae Tao clinic in Mae Sot, Tak province, on the border with Myanmar. Rations for refugees have been cut this month, sparking fears for the health of more vulnerable residents of the camps.

The Nation

Refugees face increased hardship as funds dry up ahead of their expected repatriation

With once-isolated Myanmar opening up since 2010 elections installed a civilian government, more international aid has poured into the country and NGOs from the West have rushed to set up headquarters there.

However, around 130,000 refugees - mostly members of the Karen ethnic group who fled a bloody conflict in their homeland in eastern Myanmar - still live in camps on the Thai side of the border.

Both governments, along with refugee groups and the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, have been negotiating their return, although no timeframe has been set. Yet with the funding drying up, aid workers on the border say the situation is become increasingly desperate.

"The funding available for humanitarian support is decreasing," says Sally Thompson, head of The Border Consortium (TBC), a group of 10 international NGOs working in the field. "In 2014 we will still find ways to support refugees, but we have got to do it more efficiently. There are no spare funds."

Many refugees will see their rice rations for December cut as households are categorised according to need. Although the most needy households will receive more rice - alongside meagre rations of split peas, vegetable oil, flour and fish paste - the cuts are driven by reductions in funding for food aid.

Thompson says the protracted nature of the situation on the border, the opening up of Myanmar, and talk of the refugees returning within the next few years, make it increasingly difficult to attract funding.

Many have no wish to return anyway. The first camps opened in 1984, and now more than half the population is aged under 19. "Most of the youth in the camps don't know what a life is like in Burma, they don't relate to a life in Burma," says Thompson. "Their formative years have all been here in Thailand."

In the camps, they have had access to basic healthcare and education provided by international NGOs, as well as vocational training in subjects such as mechanics, hairdressing, baking and tailoring. If they are sent back to Karen state, which lacks even the most basic infrastructure, they can look forward to little more than a life based on subsistence farming.

For decades following Myanmar's independence in 1948, the Karen fought a bloody war for independence or greater autonomy. A ceasefire was signed early last year, but the Myanmar army still maintains a strong presence in the area, prompting fear and suspicion among those who fled the atrocities it carried out.

Although Thai authorities bar residents from leaving the camps, many do find work locally, leaving themselves open to arrest and exploitation. They usually receive less than the minimum wage, and unscrupulous employers often refuse to pay them at all. Young women are especially vulnerable to sexual abuse by employers and authority figures such as policemen and government officials.

Some refugees with an entrepreneurial spirit have found ways to make a living in the camps by selling everything from food to clothing and mobile phones. But to make its limited funds go further, the TBC says it now needs to focus its efforts on those it considers most vulnerable, and is encouraging those who can to take more responsibility for themselves.

"They do a lot for themselves now, they always have done," says a clearly frustrated Thompson at her office in downtown Bangkok. "They haven't been lying around indolently and doing nothing, but on the other hand their choices have been very restricted, so they have been very dependent on what the international humanitarian community has provided."

Admitting that the level of assistance now provided is "extremely marginal", she adds: "We are asking them to take more risks because we don't have the funds. It's not good to have to do that. We are asking people to look at what the risks are and how to protect themselves."

The TBC - formerly known as the Thai-Burma Border Consortium - opened an office in Yangon in August, in preparation for the return of the refugees. Many think this could take place after elections due in Myanmar in 2015, if they go ahead peacefully and are deemed free and fair.

Among the organisations that are feeling the pinch as the funding dries up is the renowned Mae Tao Clinic in the Thai border town of Mae Sot. It was set up in 1989 by Dr Cynthia Maung, an ethnic Karen who fled the fighting in her home country and has since won many awards for her humanitarian work.

The clinic now treats around 100,000 patients a year. Nearly half of these travel from Myanmar to receive treatment, and the rest are migrant workers living in Thailand.

In July, the Australian overseas aid agency AusAID announced that it was cutting its funding to the clinic, and Dr Maung says many donors have yet to commit beyond 2015, when 40 per cent of the current funding runs out.

The clinic's budget is around Bt100 million to Bt120 million a year, including Bt10 million-Bt12 million annually from the British government.

Like Thompson, Dr Maung is concerned that health and education services currently provided by civic organisations on the border will suffer from the cuts, noting that it will take years to build up decent infrastructure in Myanmar.

"We are a big organisation so we have more access to funding than other, smaller organisations, but we are struggling and trying to readjust our programmes," she said. "The big problem is smaller organisations and schools … We worry about the child labour issue if the schools aren't open and there is no access to education."

Dr Maung hasn't been back to Myanmar since she fled in the aftermath of the 1988 student uprising that led to a brutal crackdown by the ruling military, but she says there is a need to build stronger civil society organisations there. She hopes to go back one day, but in the meantime wants to continue her work treating migrant workers and refugees.

"The border is very unique," she says. "We belong to both countries."

Mark Fenn is a Bangkok-based journalist. He has written for publications including the Times of London, The Independent, South China Morning Post and the Far East Economic Review.

Thailand Will Help With Any Rohingya Investigation – PM


BANGKOK — Thailand will help the United Nations and the United States with any investigation into the findings of a Reuters report that Thai immigration officials moved Burma refugees into human-trafficking rings, the prime minister said on Saturday.

The United Nations and the United States called on Friday for an investigation into the report, published on Thursday and based on a two-month investigation in three countries, that revealed a clandestine policy to remove Rohingya refugees from Thai immigration detention centers and deliver them to human traffickers waiting at sea.

Thai Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra, who chairs a government committee on human trafficking, declined to comment on the findings when asked about her reaction.

“I cannot comment on the Rohingya issue and reaction as this is the responsibility of the Foreign Ministry to handle,” she said in a comment to Reuters, delivered through an aide.

“The ministry will liaise with the United States and the U.N. to help with any investigation they need.”

The Rohingya are stateless Muslims from Burma. Clashes between Rohingya and ethnic Arakanese Buddhists exploded in Burma last year, making 140,000 people homeless, most of them Rohingya.

Since then, tens of thousands of Rohingya have fled from Burma by boat and many arrive off southwest Thailand.

After being delivered to human traffickers at sea, the Rohingya are transported across southern Thailand and held hostage in camps hidden near the border with Malaysia until relatives pay ransoms to release them, according to the Reuters report. Some are beaten and some are killed.

“These allegations need to be investigated urgently,” U.N. refugee agency spokeswoman Vivian Tan said in a statement.

The United States issued a similar call hours later.

“We are aware of reports alleging that Thai officials have been involved in selling Rohingya migrants to human traffickers,” U.S. State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said. “We urge the Thai government to conduct a serious and transparent investigation into the matter.”

Sanctions Risk

Major General Chatchawal of the Royal Thai Police was quoted in the Reuters report as saying that there was an unofficial policy to deport the Rohingya to Burma.

He called this “a natural way or option two”. But he said the Rohingya signed statements in which they agree they want to return to Burma.

These statements, however, were at times produced in the absence of a Rohingya-language translator, Reuters found.

New York-based watchdog group Human Rights Watch criticized Thailand for moving detainees into established smuggling and trafficking rings, and warned Thailand could face a possible downgrade in a U.S. list of the world’s worst enforcers of human-trafficking laws.

Such a downgrade would place Thailand, a close U.S. ally and Southeast Asia’s second-biggest economy, at risk of U.S. sanctions and put it on par with North Korea and Iran among the worst performers in fighting human trafficking.

The U.S. State Department is gathering information for its next Trafficking In Persons (TIP) report, due in June. Thailand faces an automatic downgrade to Tier 3, the lowest rank, unless it makes “significant efforts” to improve its record in combating trafficking, the State Department says. The Tier 3 designation could leave Thailand subject to U.S. sanctions.

Sek Wannamethee, a spokesman for Thailand’s Foreign Ministry, said earlier that the Rohingya issue was one of several the United States would take into consideration before deciding on Thailand’s grade.

Nine people have been arrested in Thailand in relation to Rohingya smuggling in 2013, including two government officials, according to police data. None of the arrests has led to convictions.

Thailand prosecuted 27 people for trafficking in 2012, down from 67 the previous year, according to the 2013 TIP Report by the U.S. State Department.

Sunday, December 8, 2013

Season for Caring: New beds for refugee family


American-Statesman Staff


Uka Aung Min, 32, his wife, Naw, 36, and their 2-year-old daughter, Okee, slept on a bed off the floor for the first time Thursday night, thanks to local company Factory Mattress Sales.

For the fourth year, the bedding company has given new mattresses, box springs and bed rails, if needed, to the families in the Statesman’s Season for Caring program, which features the needs of families throughout Central Texas and highlights the work of local nonprofit agencies.

The Aung Min family were nominated by Project Transitions, which helps people who have HIV/AIDS. Uka Aung Min learned he had the virus while in a refugee camp in Malaysia. That’s the same camp where he met Naw and where Okee was born.

Season for Caring: New beds for refugee family, others with Factory Mattress Sales donation

In the camp, they slept in one room on the floor in an apartment they shared with two other families. They lived on fish and rice and $100 a month. Uka Aung Min pointed to a rug in the living room and said that in Malaysia or Burma, they would think that was a very nice bed.

Now in Austin, they have a two-bedroom apartment provided by Project Transitions; Uka Aung Min has a new job soldering electronic parts, and he was able to save for months to buy a used car. Naw Aung Min is signed up to take classes in January at Austin Community College to learn English. She’d like to become a nurse’s assistant.

Their American Dream has begun. And now they sleep on real beds.

Factory Mattress Sales warehouse supervisors John Moore and Dustin Montez arrived Thursday with a queen and a twin bed and bedrails.

“We’re going to get you taken care of today,” John Moore said. “How would you like them set up?”

Now in one of the bedrooms, the beds sit side-by-side. They’ve become accustomed to being in one room, together as a family, but when the time is right, they can now move Okee to the other bedroom. Their old mattresses on the floor will go to another Project Transitions family.

When Montez brought in the twin bed, he smiled at Okee and said, “This must be your bed.”

Okee tested both beds. They are just right, incredibly soft.

“You’re going to have a wonderful night’s sleep tonight,” Montez said to the family as he and Moore left.

“It’s very nice,” Uka Aung Min said. “Thank you.”

Mark Nelson, chief operating officer of Factory Mattress Sales, says giving to Season for Caring is an easy decision for the company. “It’s bona fide need,” he said. “People have determined that these families are really in need and in desperate situations. The need is real, and that’s not always the case.”

Season for Caring is not the only program the company has donated to this year. It has given 18 mattresses to victims of the Halloween flood so far, and working with The Society of St. Vincent de Paul, gave 200 sets to families in West. The Season for Caring donation is worth about $7,300, and beds will be delivered through January.

The Aung Min family still has many needs. Their most pressing is daycare for Okee, so Naw can go to school in January. They also would love help with medical bills, English tutoring, a couch, dressers, a toy box, a dining room set, small kitchen appliances and gift cards for gas, groceries and clothing. Uka Aung Min has been try to save to be able to buy Okee some new crayons and would love more educational toys for her.

To find out more about the Aung Min family or to donate something on the wish list, contact Project Transitions at 512-454-8646. For more information about Season for Caring, email community@statesman.com or call 512-445-3590.

Friday, December 6, 2013

Thai officials sell refugees to traffickers


The Yomiuri Shimbun

RANONG, Thailand (Reuters)—One afternoon in October, in the watery no-man’s land between Thailand and Myanmar, Muhammad Ismail vanished.

Thai immigration officials said he was being deported to Myanmar. In fact, they sold Ismail, 23, and hundreds of other Rohingya Muslims to human traffickers, who then spirited them into brutal jungle camps.

As thousands of Rohingya flee Myanmar to escape religious persecution, a Reuters investigation in three countries has uncovered a clandestine policy to remove Rohingya refugees from Thailand’s immigration detention centers and deliver them to human traffickers waiting at sea.

The Rohingya are then transported across southern Thailand and held hostage in a series of camps hidden near the border with Malaysia until relatives pay thousands of dollars to release them. Reporters located three such camps—two based on the testimony of Rohingya held there, and a third by trekking to the site, heavily guarded, near a village called Baan Klong Tor.

Thousands of Rohingya have passed through this tropical gulag. An untold number have died there. Some have been murdered by camp guards or have perished from dehydration or disease, survivors said in interviews.

The Thai authorities say the movement of Rohingya through their country doesn’t amount to human trafficking. But in interviews for this story, the Thai Royal Police acknowledged, for the first time, a covert policy called “option two” that relies upon established human-smuggling networks to rid Thailand of Rohingya detainees.

Ismail was one of five Rohingya who said that Thai immigration officials had sold him outright or aided in their sale to human traffickers. “It seemed so official at first,” said Ismail, a wiry farmer with a long narrow face and tight curly hair. “They took our photographs. They took our fingerprints. And then once in the boats, about 20 minutes out at sea, we were told we had been sold.”

Ismail said he ended up in a camp in southern Thailand. So did Bozor Mohamed, a Rohingya whose frail body makes him seem younger than his 21 years. The camp was guarded by men with guns and clubs, said Mohamed, and at least one person died every day due to dehydration or disease.


“I used to be a strong man,” the former rice farmer said in an interview, as he massaged his withered legs.

Mohamed and others say they endured hunger, filth and multiple beatings.


U.S. urges Thai investigation into alleged trafficking


(Reuters) - The United States called on Thailand on Friday to investigate allegations in a Reuters report that Thai immigration officials delivered Myanmar refugees to human trafficking rings.

"We are aware of reports alleging that Thai officials have been involved in selling Rohingya migrants to human traffickers. We urge the Thai government to conduct a serious and transparent investigation into the matter," U.S. State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said.

"We remain deeply concerned about the safety of and humanitarian conditions for vulnerable communities in Burma, including refugees and asylum seekers on Burma's borders and elsewhere in the region," she added.

The United Nations also called for an investigation on Friday. "These allegations need to be investigated urgently," U.N. refugee agency spokeswoman Vivian Tan said in a statement.

The Reuters report, published on Thursday and based on a two-month investigation in three countries, revealed a clandestine policy to remove Rohingya refugees from Thailand's immigration detention centers and deliver them to human traffickers waiting at sea.

The Rohingya, stateless Muslims from Myanmar, are then transported across southernThailand and held hostage in camps hidden near the border with Malaysia until relatives pay ransoms to release them, according to the Reuters report. Some are beaten and some are killed.

(Reporting By Arshad Mohammed; Editing by Doina Chiacu)

UNHCR chief meets Pope Francis to discuss refugee issues


Pope Francis discusses refugee issues with High Commissioner Guterres in the Vatican today.

ROME, Italy, December 6 (UNHCR)– Pope Francis discussed the plight of millions of forcibly displaced people around the world with UN High Commissioner for Refugees António Guterres on Friday during a private audience in Vatican City.

Guterres expressed his deep appreciation for the Pope's work in bringing public attention to refugees and internally displaced people, as well as putting a spotlight on the dangerous land and sea journeys that some asylum-seekers and migrants take.

The High Commissioner welcomed the Pope's recent calls for enhanced efforts to save lives in the Mediterranean, at a time when increasing numbers of people, including refugees from Syria, Eritrea and Somalia, are crossing the Mediterranean by irregular sea routes to reach Europe.

Guterres told Pope Francis about UNHCR's Strategy on Protection At Sea, which focuses on enhancing rescue, promoting protection from exploitation and abuse as well as establishing protection-sensitive responses after disembarkation.

Pope Francis and the High Commissioner also shared their worries about the magnitude of the humanitarian crisis in Syria and the need for massive support to neighbouring countries, now hosting more than 2.2 million refugees.

The High Commissioner spoke of his concern at reports of some European Union countries placing barriers or forcibly returning refugees, including people fleeing the conflict in Syria. He noted that UNHCR has called for a global moratorium on returns to Syria and neighbouring countries.

The two men also discussed UNHCR's efforts to reach out to faith leaders, including through a December 2012 "Dialogue on Faith and Protection." In October, Pope Francis met 2013 Nansen Refugee Award winner Angélique Namaika, a Roman Catholic nun from Democratic Republic of the Congo.

UN Calls for Investigation into Alleged Thai Human Trafficking

BANGKOK — The United Nations called on Friday for an urgent investigation into allegations in a Reuters report that Thai immigration officials moved Burma refugees into human trafficking rings.

The report, published on Thursday and based on a two-month investigation in three countries, revealed a clandestine policy to remove Rohingya refugees from Thailand's immigration detention centers and deliver them to human traffickers waiting at sea.
A Thai police immigration post in the port city of Ranong in southern Thailand Oct. 30, 2013.
A Thai police immigration post in the port city of Ranong in southern Thailand Oct. 30, 2013.


The Rohingya, stateless Muslims from Burma, are then transported across southern Thailand and held hostage in camps hidden near the border with Malaysia until relatives pay ransoms to release them, according to the Reuters report. Some are beaten and some are killed.

“These allegations need to be investigated urgently,” U.N. refugee agency spokeswoman Vivian Tan said in a statement. “We have consistently asked countries in the region to provide temporary protection, including protection against abuse and exploitation.”

Maj. Gen. Chatchawal of the Royal Thai Police in Bangkok said in the report there was an unofficial policy to deport the Rohingya to Burma. He called this “a natural way or option two.” But he said the Rohingya signed statements in which they agree they want to return to Burma.

These statements, however, were at times produced in the absence of a Rohingya language translator.

“The detainees also need to be informed about their options in a language they understand. Any decision to leave must be voluntary, and those who choose to leave must be protected against abuse and exploitation by smugglers,” said Tan.

Rights group seeks explanation 

A senior official at New York-based Human Rights Watch criticized Thailand for moving detainees into established smuggling and trafficking rings and warned Thailand could face a possible downgrade in a U.S. list of the world's worst offenders in fighting human trafficking.

Such a downgrade would place Thailand, a close U.S. ally and Southeast Asia's second-biggest economy, on par with North Korea, Iran and Saudi Arabia among the worst offenders in fighting human trafficking, which could lead to U.S. sanctions.

“The Thai government has some serious explaining to do before the international community,” said Phil Robertson, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch.

The U.S. State Department is gathering information for its next Trafficking In Persons (TIP) report, due to be published in June. Thailand faces an automatic downgrade to Tier 3, the lowest rank, unless it makes “significant efforts” to improve its record in combating trafficking, the State Department says.

“Unless Thailand makes it a top priority to clean these rackets up, and investigate and prosecute all those involved, Bangkok should kiss goodbye any prospect of escaping Tier 3 in the annual U.S. anti-trafficking report,” Robertson said.

Sek Wannamethee, a spokesman for Thailand's Foreign Ministry, said the Rohingya issue was one of several the United States would take into consideration before deciding whether to downgrade or upgrade Thailand.

“The United States will look at the overall progress of Thailand,” he said. “The focus is on persecution and convictions and Thailand has made substantive progress.”

The numbers, however, suggest enforcement is losing steam. Nine people have been arrested in Thailand in relation to Rohingya-smuggling in 2013, including two government officials, according to police data. None of the arrests has led to convictions, however.

Thailand prosecuted 27 people for trafficking in 2012, down from 67 the previous year, according to the 2013 TIP Report. Only 10 of those prosecutions - one of them an official - resulted in convictions, the report said.

Clashes between Rohingya and ethnic Rakhine Buddhists exploded in Burma last year, making 140,000 people homeless, most of them Rohingya. Since then, tens of thousands of Rohingya have fled from Burma by boat.

Chin ethnics flee Myanmar en masse to avoid human rights abuse, political insecurity



YANGON—More than 100,000 Chin ethnic people have fled Myanmar due to human rights abuses and political insecurity, Lyan Bwe Hsan from the Chin Human Rights Organization said yesterday at the Chin National Conference. 

“I think about 70,000 Chin people are staying as refugees in India. And 40-50,000 Chin refugees are living in Malaysia. When we went to a refugee camp in Thailand, we saw about 250 Chin people. There are roughly 500 Chin refugees in Thailand. The refugee problem is our Chin people’s main issue. Most of the Chin nationals are going abroad. Due to human right abuses and political insecurity, they [Chin people] are going to foreign countries,” said Lyan Bwe Hsan.

Those attending the Chin National Conference will urge the Chin State government army troops and Chin national military group to reduce military tensions so that Chin people who have already gone abroad can return and so that there will not be an increase in Chin refugees.

“At the conference, we discussed matters on refugees’ affairs, such as how to try to stop the increase in refugees, and how to reduce human right abuses. We also thought about whether or not state military troops are needed in Chin State because the government has already signed an agreement with the Chin National Force. Is Battalion 53 in Chin State needed for security? Those issues are very important factors for reducing the refugee rate,” he added.

The main problems of Chin refugees are political mis-administration, ethnic discrimination and human rights abuse.

For these reasons, the Chin National Conference released a statement calling for positive action to secure peace, freedom, and an end to military conflict.

Migrants' Fate: $1,000 Debt for 12-Hour Factory Shifts


By Cam Simpson November 25, 2013

This report by Bloomberg highlights to us in Malaysia about requirements imposed by 2012 Obama's executive order, and other standards. It also highlights the standards followed by some of the Brands which also must be followed by all in its supply chain. The efforts of Cam Simpson, the author, is appreciated. Maybe all electronic and other companies must be also compelled to keep informed the various Unions and groups that work with workers and migrant workers. Maybe even simplified translations of these matters in the language of the migrant worker/worker must also be placed on notice boards at the workplace, and also through pamphlets to workers - even on websites. There should also be information of what to do in the case of non-compliance.

Factory Worker on a Bus
A foreign factory worker smiles on a 'worker bus' at the Majestic Heights, Paya Terubong in Penang, Malaysia. Photographer: Goh Seng Chong/Bloomberg

Sita Magar is a single mother of four who earns whatever she can wring from six goats and the muscle of a rented water buffalo. After paved roads end, it takes four hours to reach her farm along a trail where felled trunks, like twisted balance beams, span a raging stream. Even so, a recruiter feeding migrant workers into the global electronics industry found Magar in her mountainside Nepalese village last year. He convinced her to borrow more money than she’d ever seen, about $1,000, and pay him to get her daughter a position at a factory in Malaysia. 

After a year, the girl was dismissed and sent home when a company-mandated pregnancy test came back positive, leaving the family still impoverished and with years of added debt.

Migrant workers recruited through such practices make electronic components that are critical to companies building defense and aerospace systems, medical devices, industrial technology and virtually everything else incorporating microchips and circuits, according to interviews with workers and supply-chain data compiled by Bloomberg.


An unregulated network of thousands of brokers induces workers into buying their jobs with fees often equal to a year’s wages at home. At the factories, employers often take their passports. If they want to leave, workers often have to hand over months of wages to get them back. 

BUYING JOBS

The Magar family is one of tens of thousands from some of Asia’s poorest corners who were sold on the idea of going deep into debt to buy jobs on production lines in Malaysia, a manufacturing hub for the global electronics industry. Interviews with 60 Nepalese workers from 22 companies showed that the transnational system for recruiting them is rife with abuses -- and extend far beyond the making of consumer devices, such as Apple Inc (AAPL:US).’s iPhone, and into virtually all of the technology running the modern world.

Purna Kumar Tamang, 31, borrowed more than two years of earnings in his Himalayan village to pay a broker for a job at a Western Digital plant on the Malaysian island of Penang. Not long after he arrived, his wife grew seriously ill, trapping him between two grim options inside the hard-drive maker’s factory: leaving her alone so he could stay and work off their debt, or returning to care for her and face financial ruin. 
“Those days were very hard,” Tamang said. 

OBAMA ORDER

The companies that rely on these workers, either directly or through suppliers, include U.S. government contractors who now may be in violation of an executive order signed by President Barack Obama last year. Titled “Strengthening Protections Against Trafficking in Persons in Federal Contracts,” it bans the selling of jobs, no matter how big or small the fees, to overseas workers for companies that provide any goods or services to the U.S. government, according to lawyers who represent federal contractors and those who help trafficking victims. It also applies to subcontractors.

While rules for enforcing the order are still being written, experts said the no-fee provision will be included and could have a dramatic effect on an industry that both touches so many products and relies so heavily on workers paying brokers for their jobs.

“The executive order says no recruitment fees,” said W. Barron A. Avery, who represents government contractors and subcontractors at the Washington-based law firm Wiley Rein LLP (1292L:US).

Jennifer Plitsch, a partner in the government-contracts practice group at Covington & Burling LLP (1175L:US), agreed on the potentially widespread impact. “Most industries have long supply chains,” Plitsch said, “and these rules will apply all the way down.”


ZERO ENFORCEMENT

The no-fees provision of Obama’s order was “a huge victory for the anti-trafficking community,” said Martina Vandenberg, a former partner at Jenner & Block LLP(1180L:US) who established the Human Trafficking Pro Bono Legal Center last year. Enforcement will be crucial, she said, adding that human trafficking provisions have been “on the books for a decade, and there has been almost zero enforcement.”

Electronics makers operating in Malaysia, including Sony Corp. and the $17.7 billion hard-drive maker Western Digital, rely almost exclusively on foreign migrant workers for production, according to interviews with workers, recruiters, and industry and Nepalese government officials.


Many companies say they try to regulate recruiters’ behavior to mitigate abuses, though interviews with the 60 factory workers show what happens when principles collide with business needs: Even companies with strict human-rights policies can create conditions that worsen the exploitation of migrant workers. As previously reported by Bloomberg News, 40 other Nepalese sent home from a Malaysian plant that made iPhone cameras experienced similar treatment.

OFF-SHORING HUB

Malaysia, following its independence from British Colonial rule in 1957, turned itself into a center for the rapidly off-shoring American technology industry. International Business Machines Corp. (IBM:US) and other semiconductor makers were among the first to build facilities there. By last year, about one-third of the southeast Asian nation’s total exports, or $72.3 billion, came from electronics. 

In the past quarter-century, the country’s prosperity has reduced unemployment to 3.1 percent for Malaysian citizens. Their poverty rate sits at 1.7 percent, down from 15.5 percent in 1989. That has meant they’re largely unwilling to take menial jobs, leaving the country’s electronics factories to rely on foreign migrants for production. Other industries, including construction and agriculture, do as well. 

HUMAN EXPORTS

Nepal, one of Asia’s most impoverished nations, is the second-biggest source of foreign workers in Malaysia, behind neighboring Indonesia.

Groups such as Verité, a Massachusetts-based nonprofit that conducts audits for Apple in Malaysia and Taiwan, have for years warned that debts and passport seizures can keep migrants entrapped as “bonded laborers” on factory floors.Purna Kumar Tamang is one of them.

Last year, the promise of foreign wages from an American technology company reached his village, a three-day walk from the nearest drivable road in the Himalayan Mountains of northeastern Nepal. Tamang, his wife and two children were living on the food they could grow and the roughly $50 he made each month doing odd jobs. That put them on the edge of what the World Bank defines as extreme poverty. It wasn’t hard for a recruiter in a neighboring village to persuade him he could do better. Tamang borrowed more than $1,300 to pay for a job at Western Digital’s plant in Penang. “I had to earn some money because we’re poor,” he said.

PAYING AGENTS

The recruiters were working with a Malaysian manpower broker, which in turn was working for Western Digital, company officials said. 

Tamang was among more than two-dozen men recruited from Nepal and sent to the Penang plant in August and September 2012, according to interviews with Tamang, 13 other workers and Western Digital (WDC:US) representatives. Each man said he paid the equivalent of $1,300 to $1,800 to Nepalese labor agents. 

The 12-hour shifts at the plant were long, but Tamang was happy with the money he was earning. It supported his family back home, serviced the interest on his broker debt, whittled down the principal and paid some of his expenses in Malaysia. Then, earlier this year, Tamang’s wife, Manika, began to suffer severe uterine pains. By the spring, doctors feared she might need a hysterectomy. She called him in Malaysia two or three times a day, often in pain, never daring to ask him to return.

DAILY CALLS

“I want to be home,” he said when he first met a reporter in Malaysia in late May. The only thing keeping him in Penang, Tamang said, were the debts from buying his job -- fees that were illegally excessive even under the little-enforced labor laws of Nepal. 

By July, he couldn’t bear his wife’s daily calls any longer. He negotiated his return home with the Malaysian manpower broker, which made him pay about $600 (1,400 MYR) for his return ticket. Now back in Nepal, Tamang still owes more than $300, plus monthly interest payments. The principal alone is about six months of earnings in his village. 

In an initial interview, Michael Meston, Western Digital’s vice president for human resources in Asia, said the company had eliminated the involvement of Malaysian manpower agents in its recruitment process for the foreign workers among its 24,000 employees in Malaysia. The company also started paying all fees for foreign migrants, he said, giving Western Digital one of the strongest policies against bonded labor in the industry.

‘DIFFICULT DECISION’

Meston then said he remembered that the company deviated from those practices after a chain of events beginning with floods in Thailand two years ago that crippled the company’s plants there. Western Digital, based in Irvine, California, moved to quickly boost production for a critical component on a new line in Penang last year. 

Because of a tight labor market and “the need to rapidly ramp up the manufacturing facility, we made the difficult decision to make an exception to our newly established process” at the Penang plant, he said, adding that Western Digital hired a Malaysian broker who, in turn, worked with recruiters in Nepal.

Tamang’s case exemplifies what the company wants to avoid, Meston said: “The whole reason that we adopted, why we changed our recruitment practices and our whole process for employing people from overseas, is exactly to avoid the scenario you just characterized, which is employees being charged excessive recruitment fees and effectively having them feel like they can’t leave because they have this massive debt.”

PARTIAL REIMBURSEMENT

Meston said the Nepalese men were supposed to have received about $600 extra from Western Digital’s Malaysian manpower broker by the end of June -- almost a year after they arrived -- to reimburse a portion of the fees. He said the company also was examining whether further compensation was appropriate.

Only a handful of European and American electronics companies pay the full cost of recruiting their foreign workers and bringing them into Malaysia, said Shirley Lua, a senior marketing manager for the Kuala Lumpur-based Winbond Group. The few who do in some cases, including Western Digital, do it either because of human-rights concerns, or because they need people quickly, and no-fee offers can get workers on production lines faster, said Lua, whose firm runs worker-outsourcing and recruitment agencies for manufacturers across Malaysia.

EVERYBODY PAYS

Much more common, Lua said, is requiring migrant workers to pay brokers in their home countries for their jobs. That way, it’s the workers themselves, not the manufacturers, who pay all costs associated with their own recruitment and importation, as well as the premiums collected by agents at home. 

“They have to pay,” Lua said in her office this summer. “Every worker, they come, they will pay.” In Nepal, they’re recruited through more than 750 officially registered foreign-employment agencies and a vast network of unofficial channels. Each registered agency can extend its reach into remote villages through dozens, if not hundreds, of sub-agents who workers say often demand their own fees. 


Such agents have helped make the Nepalese people one of their country’s top exports. Nepalis abroad wired home about $5 billion last year, or about one-quarter of Nepal’s gross domestic product, according to World Bank estimates. Although legal caps for how much brokers can charge exist on paper in Nepal, the fees actually collected are virtually unregulated in both Nepal and Malaysia, according to a report this summer from Verité, the Amherst-based nonprofit that runs bonded-labor audits for Apple.

CONDUCT CODE

Nepal and Malaysia have no formal agreement on regulating the trade in workers. Nepal faces severe resource constraints in trying to protect its workers, as well as corruption, Verité, said in a report this year, in part citing 2010 research for the World Bank. 

Almost every electronics company today has a code of conduct on the rights of workers, or it subscribes to one established by the Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition, or EICC, based in Alexandria, Virginia. Its first provision covers “freely chosen employment” and bars “excessive fees” for workers that lead to conditions of bonded labor. 

For Apple, any worker in its 250 supplier-factories who is charged more than one month’s net pay is considered a bonded laborer. If violations are caught in subsequent audits, Apple pushes suppliers to compensate the workers -- a policy that spokesman Chris Gaither said is tougher than any of its competitors.

EXCESSIVE FEES

Fees paid by all but one of the 60 people working for other companies and interviewed for this story exceeded Apple’s limits. For at least 49 of them, the amounts they said they paid were four times their monthly factory wages in Malaysia. 

More than four of every five workers interviewed said they paid fees greater than the most generous definition of “excessive” often relied upon by the industry -- the roughly $800 maximum set by Nepal for workers heading to Malaysia. Even that amount can be a year’s worth of work or more in remote villages like Tamang’s. 

More than 7 out of 10 electronics workers in Malaysia interviewed for this story said that in order to pay agents for their jobs, they had to borrow funds. Others used family savings. 

The possibility of bonded labor across the global electronics supply chain could be especially troublesome for defense and aerospace contractors, as well as their component makers, if Obama’s order is enforced. That’s because weapons systems, satellites and aircraft are loaded with specially made electronics.

MOTOROLA WORKERS

Migrant workers in Malaysia for Motorola Solutions (MSI:US) Inc., which makes walkie-talkies and other communications devices for government and private-sector clients, said they paid fees and had their passports taken. So did workers at two of its local suppliers. 

Tama McWhinney, a spokeswoman for Schaumburg, Illinois-based Motorola Solutions, said it will investigate. In e-mailed statements, she said the company pays all recruitment fees for workers, and “is proud of its outstanding commitment to corporate responsibility and is committed to ensuring that its workplaces and those of its suppliers comply with legal requirements and appropriate labor rights and standards.” She also said Motorola Solutions last year found four suppliers in violation of its policy on bonded labor, and took quick corrective actions.

PASSPORTS TAKEN

Workers for Plexus Corp. (PLXS:US), a U.S. company with $1.3 billion in market capitalization and four connected plants in Penang, paid some of the highest fees among workers interviewed. They also said they had their passports taken. Plexus’s manufacturing operations are anchored in Penang, which accounted for 35 percent of its revenues in 2012, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Many of its customers sell to the U.S. government, including several whose biggest clients are federal agencies, such as Raytheon Co (RTN:US)., General Dynamics Corp (GD:US)., Honeywell International, BAE Systems Plc., and Motorola Solutions, Bloomberg Industries data show. 

Plexus also provides contract manufacturing for smaller firms, including Minelab Americas Inc., the U.S. unit of an Australian company that sells metal-detecting equipment to the U.S. government. On Sept. 27, 2012, two days after Obama signed his anti-human trafficking order, the U.S. State Department awarded Minelab a contract for mine-detection gear, according to federal contracting data. On Oct. 27 of this year, the company received a shipment from the Plexus Penang complex of more than four tons of “metal detectors and parts,” separate U.S. Customs records show.

‘SERIOUS PROBLEM’

In an e-mail, Angelo Ninivaggi, a senior vice president and the chief administrative officer for Neenah, Wisconsin-based Plexus, said, “We do not believe that any items we manufacture in Malaysia are sold under a U.S. government contract or subcontract.” 

He also said that media attention to the issue “has positively raised industry awareness to a serious problem.” The use of brokers “is common in Malaysia and many other countries and, if done ethically, creates positive economic opportunity for individuals,” he said. 

Plexus’s own use of labor agents has been “in compliance with laws, including U.S. laws,” Ninivaggi said. 

“We remain committed to principles of social responsibility, including the fair treatment of all of our workers, and we will continue with a proactive and comprehensive review of our practices in this area to ensure that abuses do not exist with any individuals working in a Plexus facility.”

BROTHERS BOUND

Among those who worked for Plexus, Dambar Adhikari, a 29-year-old father of two boys, said he paid more than $1,400 last year for a job at a Malaysian electronics company called Nationgate Technology. So did his brother, who went with him. Shortly after arriving, the men found they were working for an outsourcing firm. Before long, they said, they were reassigned to Plexus’s complex in Penang. Other Plexus workers said they had paid fees of up to $1,700. 

Earlier this year, Adhikari’s youngest son, who is 3, was struck by a motorcycle on a roadway back home in Nepal, where streets are clogged with people, cattle, buses and scooters. After his wife pleaded with him on the phone, Adhikari said he decided to swallow his debt and return home. 


He spent more than a week trying to get his passport back. The main challenge was figuring out who had it. It was a man at a firm in Penang that handled his pay for Plexus. He wouldn’t release it until Adhikari paid the man’s firm about $800, Adhikari said, even though he had produced medical reports detailing his son’s condition. Adhikari said his brother is now trapped in Malaysia by both of their debts.

CORE VIOLATION

Under corporate and industry standards, as well as U.S. law governing federal contractors and subcontractors, taking and holding passports of foreign migrant workers is a core violation of their human rights. 

Yet Lua, the senior marketing manager for Winbond, said it’s standard for her firm. “Our driver will deliver the workers -- 10 workers, 10 passports -- through HR, to human resources,” she said. Employers keep passports, Lua said, so workers don’t become “runaways.” 

Hundreds of Sony workers from Nepal also owe debts to labor agents back home, according to interviews with seven workers and the former Nepalese labor attaché to Malaysia, Surya Bhandari, who worked with Sony. The company recruits women from Nepal to work at the Sony EMCS audio plant in northern Malaysia. They are not supposed to make up-front cash payments to get their jobs, the workers and Bhandari said.

DOUBLE DIPPING

Instead, each woman was required to sign a “foreign worker loan agreement” with the Nepalese manpower agency that sent her to Malaysia. In them, the women agreed “to make repayment for the loan to the agent,” even though they never received any funds from these so-called loans, according to the interviews and a copy of the agreement obtained by Bloomberg News. 

Sony then automatically deducted “installment” payments for the Nepalese manpower agents from the women’s monthly checks, according to the loan agreement, Sony payroll records and interviews with workers. 

The deductions went up 35 percent this year, according to the workers. Even with the agreements, four of the seven Sony women interviewed for this story said the Nepalese labor recruiters double-dipped by also forcing them to pay from $260 to $300 before leaving.
FEMALE PREFERENCE
In an e-mailed statement, Sony spokesman George Boyd said the company was “looking into the matter” and that the company’s policy is to “adopt sound labor and employment practices and to treat its employees at all times in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations of the countries and regions in which it operates.” 

Many factory operators in the region prefer to hire women because they are viewed “as more controllable,” said Dionne Harrison, a London-based executive for Impactt, a consultancy that has worked with Apple and other companies on labor issues. “They tend to be more loyal and they make less trouble.” 

Women can face special indignities, including harassment and mandatory pregnancy testing that can lead to their firing, Harrison said. 

In the case of the Magar family, their daughter was dismissed and sent home to her mountainside village in July after failing a pregnancy test. That happened before her mother had a chance to repay the $1,000 they borrowed to send her. 

Because the girl was 16 and couldn’t legally work in Malaysia, her mother said the recruiter persuaded her to borrow $500 more to falsify a passport listing the girl’s age as 21. Each extra year cost $100, she said.

FALSIFIED DOCUMENTS

The girl went to work for a Malaysian company called JCY International, records show. It has supplied hard-drive components to Samsung, Western Digital, Seagate and others. 

In an e-mail, Calvin Lim, a spokesman for JCY and its financial controller, said falsified documents make it impossible for the company to detect the true age of a worker. He said the company has “a very clear policy of not hiring underage workers, and this message had been conveyed to all recruitment agents.” He also said JCY would try to further tighten recruiting practices. 

He also said that Malaysian immigration authorities won’t allow pregnant workers to renew their annual work permit. “We have no choice but to send her back to Nepal upon finding out that she had tested positive during her mandatory annual medical,” Lim said. “We were at all times not aware that she was underage.”

Lim said JCY didn’t know “the exact amount foreign agents charge, and the way the workers raise their money.” But he said the company would investigate and, “if there is any wrongdoing, we will ask the agent or make other necessary arrangement to refund or compensate the worker and family.” 

The firing of Magar’s daughter, now 17, gave her a chance to finally meet the man who had bankrolled the family’s broker fees. After hearing her daughter had been sent home, he showed up at their farm unannounced and demanded his money, with interest. “He threatened us,” she said.

Now that her daughter isn’t working, she has no idea how she’ll come up with the payments. 

To contact the reporter on this story: Cam Simpson in London at csimpson13@bloomberg.net 
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Melissa Pozsgay at mpozsgay@bloomberg.net


Thursday, December 5, 2013

Thailand secretly supplies Myanmar refugees to trafficking rings



RANONG (Thailand): One afternoon in October, in the watery no-man’s land between Thailand and Myanmar, Muhammad Ismail vanished.

Thai immigration officials said he was being deported to Myanmar. In fact, they sold Ismail, 23, and hundreds of other Rohingya Muslims to human traffickers, who then spirited them into brutal jungle camps.

As thousands of Rohingya flee Myanmar to escape religious persecution, a Reuters investigation in three countries has uncovered a clandestine policy to remove Rohingya refugees from Thailand’s immigration detention centers and deliver them to human traffickers waiting at sea.

The Rohingya are then transported across southern Thailand and held hostage in a series of camps hidden near the border with Malaysia until relatives pay thousands of dollars to release them. Reporters located three such camps – two based on the testimony of Rohingya held there, and a third by trekking to the site, heavily guarded, near a village called Baan Klong Tor.

Thousands of Rohingya have passed through this tropical gulag. An untold number have died there. Some have been murdered by camp guards or have perished from dehydration or disease, survivors said in interviews.

The Thai authorities say the movement of Rohingya through their country doesn’t amount to human trafficking. But in interviews for this story, the Thai Royal Police acknowledged, for the first time, a covert policy called “option two” that relies upon established human-smuggling networks to rid Thailand of Rohingya detainees.

Ismail was one of five Rohingya who said that Thai immigration officials had sold him outright or aided in their sale to human traffickers. “It seemed so official at first,” said Ismail, a wiry farmer with a long narrow face and tight curly hair. “They took our photographs. They took our fingerprints. And then once in the boats, about 20 minutes out at sea, we were told we had been sold.”

Ismail said he ended up in a camp in southern Thailand. So did Bozor Mohamed, a Rohingya whose frail body makes him seem younger than his 21 years. The camp was guarded by men with guns and clubs, said Mohamed, and at least one person died every day due to dehydration or disease.

“I used to be a strong man,” the former rice farmer said in an interview, as he massaged his withered legs.

Mohamed and others say they endured hunger, filth and multiple beatings. Mohamed’s elbow and back are scarred from what he said were beatings administered by his captors in Thailand while he telephoned his brother-in-law in Malaysia, begging him to pay the $2,000 ransom they demanded. Some men failed to find a benefactor in Malaysia to pay their ransom. The camp became their home. “They had long beards and their hair was so long, down to the middle of their backs, that they looked liked women,” said Mohamed.

“Holding bays”

What ultimately happens to Rohingya who can’t buy their freedom remains unclear. A Thai-based smuggler said some are sold to shipping companies and farms as manual laborers for 5,000 to 50,000 baht each, or US$155 to $1,550.

“Prices vary according to their skills,” said the smuggler, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

The Arakan Project, a Rohingya advocacy group based in Thailand, says it has interviewed scores of Rohingya who have passed through the Thai camps and into Malaysia. Many Rohingya who can’t pay end up as cooks or guards at the camps, said Chris Lewa, Arakan Project’s director.

Presented with the findings of this report, Thailand’s second-highest-ranking policeman made some startling admissions. Thai officials might have profited from Rohingya smuggling in the past, said Police Maj-Gen Chatchawal Suksomjit, Deputy Commissioner General of the Royal Thai Police. He also confirmed the existence of illegal camps in southern Thailand, which he called “holding bays”.

Tarit Pengdith, chief of the Department of Special Investigation, Thailand’s equivalent of the US FBI, was also asked about the camps Reuters discovered. “We have heard about these camps in southern Thailand,” he said, “but we are not investigating this issue.”

Besieged by a political crisis and violent street protests this week, Thailand faces difficult questions about its future and global status. Among those is whether it will join North Korea, the Central African Republic and Iran among the world’s worst offenders in fighting human trafficking.

The signs are not good.

The US State Department’s annual Trafficking In Persons (TIP) report ranks countries on their record for combating the crime. For the past four years, Thailand has sat on the TIP Report’s so-called Tier 2 Watch List, the second-lowest rank. It will be automatically downgraded to Tier 3 next year unless it makes what the State Department calls “significant efforts” to eliminate human trafficking.

Dropping to Tier 3 status theoretically carries the threat of US sanctions. In practice, the United States is unlikely to sanction Thailand, one of its oldest treaty allies in Asia. But to be downgraded would be a major embarrassment to Thailand, which is now lobbying hard for a non-permanent position on the United Nations Security Council.

The Rohingya exodus

Rohingya are Muslims from Myanmar and Bangladesh, where they are usually stateless and despised as illegal immigrants. In 2012, two eruptions of violence between Rohingyas and majority Buddhists in Rakhine State in western Myanmar killed at least 192 people and made 140,000 homeless. Most were Rohingya, who live in wretched camps or under apartheid-like segregation with little access to healthcare, schools or jobs.

And so they have fled Myanmar by sea in unprecedented numbers over the past year. Ismail and Mohamed joined tens of thousands of Rohingya in one of the biggest movements of boat people since the end of the Vietnam War.

Widespread bias against the Rohingya in the region, however, makes it difficult for them to find safe haven – and easy to fall into the hands of traffickers. “No one is there to speak for them,” says Phil Robertson, deputy director for Asia at Human Rights Watch. “They are a lost people.”

Rohingya men, women and children squeeze aboard overloaded fishing boats and cargo ships to cross the Bay of Bengal. Their desired destination is Malaysia, a Muslim-majority country where at least 31,000 Rohingya already live. As Reuters reported in July, many of these refugees were waylaid in Thailand, where the Thai navy and marine police worked with smugglers to extract money for their onward trip to Malaysia.

Hundreds of Rohingyas were arrested in two headline-grabbing raids by the Thai authorities on January 9 in the towns of Padang Besar and Sadao, both near the Malaysia border. At the time, Colonel Krissakorn Paleetunyawong, deputy commander of police in the area, declared the Rohingya would be deported back to Myanmar. That never happened.

Ismail and Mohamed were among the 393 Rohingya that Thai police say were arrested that day in Padang Besar. So was Ismail’s friend Ediris, 22. The three young men all hailed from Buthedaung, a poor township in northern Rakhine State.

Their story reveals how Thailand, a rapidly developing country in the heart of Southeast Asia, shifted from cracking down on human trafficking camps to facilitating them.

A secret policy

After their arrest, Ediris and Ismail were brought to an immigration detention center (IDC) in Sadao, where they joined another 300 Rohingya rounded up from a nearby smuggler’s house. The two-story IDC, designed for a few dozen inmates, was overflowing. Women and children were moved to sheltered housing, while some men were sent to other IDCs across Thailand.

With about 1,700 Rohingya locked up nationwide, the Thai government set a July deadline to deport them all and opened talks with Myanmar on how to do it. The talks went nowhere, because the Myanmar government refused to take responsibility for what it regards as illegal immigrants from Bangladesh.

Men and teenage boys languished for months in cramped, cage-like cells, often with barely enough room to sit or stand, much less walk. In June, Reuters journalists visited an IDC in Phang Nga, near the tourist Mecca of Phuket. There were 269 men and boys crammed into a space built for no more than 100. It reeked of urine and sweat. Some detainees used crutches because their muscles had atrophied.

A doctor who inspected Sadao’s IDC in July said he found five emaciated Rohingya clinging to life. Two died on their way to hospital, said the doctor, Anatachai Thaipratan, an advisor of the Thai Islamic Medical Association.

As the plight of Rohingya detainees made world headlines, pressure mounted on Thailand. But Myanmar wouldn’t take them, nor would Malaysia. With thousands more arriving, the UN’s refugee agency issued an urgent appeal for alternative housing. The government proposed building a “mega camp” in Nakhon Sri Thammarat, another province in southern Thailand. It was rejected after an outcry from local people.

In early August, 270 Rohingya rioted at the IDC in Phang Nga. Men tore off doors separating cells, demanding to be let outside to pray at the close of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan. Over the last three weeks of August, more than 300 Rohingya fled from five detention centers.

By this time, Mohamed, the 21-year-old refugee, could no longer walk, let alone escape. His leg muscles had wasted away from months in detention in a cell shared by 95 Rohingya men. Ismail and Ediris were shuttled between various IDCs, ending up in Nong Khai, a city on Thailand’s northern border with Laos.

Thailand saw its options rapidly dwindling, a senior government official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. It couldn’t protest to Myanmar’s government to improve the lives of Rohingya and stem the exodus, the official said. That could ruffle diplomatic feathers and even jeopardize the access of Thai companies hoping to invest in Myanmar, one of the world’s hottest frontier markets.

Nor could Thailand arrest, prosecute and jail the Rohingya for breaking Thai immigration law – there were simply too many of them. “There would be no room in our prison cells,” Police Maj-Gen Chatchawal said.

That growing problem gave birth to “option two” in October, a secret policy to deport the refugees back to Myanmar that led to Rohingyas being sold to human trafficking networks.

A hint of the policy shift came weeks earlier, on September 13, when Police Lt. Gen. Panu Kerdlarppol, chief of the Immigration Bureau, met with officials from other agencies on the resort island of Koh Samui to decide what to do with the Rohingya. Afterwards, Kerdlarppol announced that immigration authorities would take statements from the Rohingya “to arrange their deportation” and see if any want to go home. Arrangements would be made for those who did.

By early October, 2,058 Rohingya were held in 14 IDCs across Thailand, according to the Internal Security Operations Command, a national security agency run by the Thai military. A month later, that number stood at about 600, according to non-governmental organizations and Muslim aid workers. By the first week of December, it was 154, Thailand’s immigration department said.

Rohingya were fast disappearing from Thailand’s IDCs, and nobody knew where they were going.

“We now belonged to them”

Central to the policy was Ranong, a sparsely populated Thai province whose geography has always made it a smugglers’ paradise. Ranong shares a long, ill-policed land and sea border with Myanmar. Its coastline is blanketed in dense mangrove forest and dotted with small, often uninhabited islands.

The provincial capital, also called Ranong, was built on tin mining but now lives off fishing and tourism. Rust-streaked trawlers from Thailand and Burma ply the same waters as dive boats and yachts. So do wooden “long-tail” boats, named after their extended drive-shafts, which ferry Burmese migrant workers to the Myanmar port of Kawthaung, only a 30-minute voyage away.

By late October, hundreds of Rohingya were being packed onto immigration trucks and driven to Ranong for processing and deportation. Among them were Ismail and Ediris, who arrived in the port city after a grueling, standing room-only journey of 1,200 km (746 miles) from Nong Khai.

At Ranong’s IDC, they were photographed and told by Thai immigration officers they were being sent back to Myanmar. “They said no other countries were accepting Rohingya, and Myanmar had become peaceful,” said Ismail.

Then they were driven to a Ranong pier and herded onto four long-tail boats, each with a three-man crew of Thais and Burmese. Once at sea, the Rohingya asked the boat driver to help them. The Burmese-speaking driver shook his head and told the Rohingya they had been sold by Thai immigration officials for 11,000 baht (US$350) each.

“They told us we now belonged to them,” said Ismail.

After about 30 minutes at sea, the boats stopped. It was early afternoon on October 23. The vessels waited until about 6 p.m., when a large fishing boat arrived. They were loaded aboard and sailed through the night until they reached a jungle island, separated from the mainland by a narrow river. It was about 4 a.m.

Ismail said he saw about 200 other Rohingya in that camp, mostly sleeping and guarded by men with guns. The guards shoved Ismail and the others into a muddy clearing. There was no water or food. He was told he must pay 60,000 Thai baht ($1,850). Did he have family who could send the money? If he did, he could go wherever he wanted, Ismail said he was told. “If you don’t, we’ll use this,” one guard said, showing an iron rod.

Ismail had some cash but not enough. “We need to escape,” he whispered to Ediris. After an hour at the camp, just before dawn, the two men made their move. A guard fired shots in the air as they ran through the jungle and waded through a river to reach the mainland. For the next 24 hours, they survived by drinking stream-water and eating the bark of banana trees. They emerged onto a rubber plantation, their feet lacerated from the bare-foot jungle trek, and met a Burmese man who promised to spirit them into Malaysia for 8,000 baht, or $250, each.

They agreed and were driven to a house in southern Thailand, where Reuters interviewed them hours before they were smuggled by pick-up across the Malaysian border.

Th jungle camps

Bozor Mohamed, the third young Rohingya from Buthedaung, said he was held for 10 days at a jungle camp in Padang Besar.

He, too, said he had been delivered by Thai officials to trafficking boats along the maritime border with Myanmar. Afterwards, in torrential rain and under cover of darkness, along with perhaps 200 other Rohingya, Mohamed said he was ferried back across the strait to Thailand, where a new ordeal began.

The men were taken on a two-day journey by van, motor-bike, and foot to a smuggler’s camp on the border with Malaysia. On the final hike, men with canes beat the young Rohingya and the others, many of them hobbled by months of detention. They stumbled and dragged themselves up steep forested hills.

Making the same trek was Mohamed Hassan, a fourth Rohingya to escape Thailand’s trafficking network. Hassan is a baby-faced 19-year-old from the Rakhine capital of Sittwe.

He said he arrived at the camp in September after an overnight journey in a pick-up truck, followed by a two-hour walk into the hills with dozens of other Rohingya. Their captors ordered them to carry supplies, he said. Already giddy with fatigue and hunger after eight days at sea, the 19-year-old shouldered a sack of rice. “If we stopped, the men beat us with sticks,” he said.

The camp was partially skirted by a barbed-wire fence, he said, and guarded by about 25 men with guns, knives and clubs. Hassan reckoned it held about 300 Rohingya. They slept on plastic sheets, unprotected from the sun and rain, and were allowed only one meal a day, of rice and dried fish. He said he was constantly hungry.

One night, two Rohingya men tried to escape. The guards tracked them down, bound their hands and dragged them back to camp. Then, the guards beat the two men with clubs, rods and lengths of rubber. “Everybody watched,” said Hassan. “We said nothing. Some people were crying.”

The beating lasted some 30 minutes, he said. Then a guard drew a small knife and slit the throat of one of the fugitives.

The prisoners were ordered to dispose of his corpse in the forest. The other victim was dumped in a stream. Afterwards, Hassan vomited with fear and exhaustion, but tried not to cry. “When I cried they beat me. I had already decided that I would die there.”

His only hope of release was his older brother, 42, a long-time resident of Thailand. Hassan said he had his brother’s telephone number with him, but at first his captors wouldn’t let him call it. (Traffickers are reluctant to deal with relatives in Thailand, in case they have contacts with the Thai authorities that could jeopardize operations.)

Eventually, Hassan reached his brother, who said he sold his motorbike to help raise the equivalent of about $3,000 to secure Hassan’s freedom, after 20 days in the camp.

Reporters were able to trace the location of three trafficking camps, based on the testimony of Rohingya who previously were held in them.

Three journalists traveled on motor-bikes and then hiked through rubber plantations and dense jungle to directly confirm the existence of a major camp near Baan Klong Tor.

Concealed by a blue tarpaulin tent, the Rohingya were split into groups of men and women. Some prayed. The encampment was patrolled by armed guards and protected by villagers and police. The reporters didn’t attempt to enter. Villagers who have visited the camp said the number of people held inside ranged from an estimated 500 to a thousand or more, depending on the number of people arriving, departing or escaping.

Interviews with about a dozen villagers also confirmed two other large camps: one less than a mile away, and another in Padang Besar, near the Malaysia border.

“That red line in the sea”

Major General Chatchawal of the Royal Thai Police in Bangkok admitted there was an unofficial policy to deport the Rohingya to Myanmar. He called this “a natural way or option two.” But he said the Rohingya went voluntarily.

“Some Rohingya in our IDCs can’t stand being in limbo, so they ask to return to where they came from,” said Chatchawal. “This means going back to Myanmar.” Rohingya at the IDCs, for instance, sign statements in the presence of a local Islamic leader, in which they agree they want to return to Myanmar.

These statements, however, were at times produced in the absence of a Rohingya language translator. When reporters visited the Sadao IDC for this story, the translator was a Muslim from Myanmar who spoke only Thai and Burmese, and thus unable to explain what the detainees were signing.

Chatchawal was also presented with recent testimony from Rohingya who said they weren’t taken to back to Myanmar. Instead, they were put in boats by Thai immigration officials, told they had been sold and taken under duress to Thailand’s camps. Reporters interviewed four Rohingya for this story who said they fell prey to trafficking with official complicity.

At the house where Ediris and Ismail were interviewed were two other survivors of the trafficking camps: Abdul Basser, 24, and Fir Mohamed, 28. They told similar stories. Both were arrested after arriving in Thailand on January 25, and held at the overcrowded Phang Nga IDC for about eight months. On October 17, the two men, along with dozens of other Rohingya, were driven overnight to Ranong.

“We were told we could go back to Myanmar,” said Mohamed.

That day, 48 Rohingya and five Buddhist Burmese were loaded into trucks and driven to a pier. The five Burmese were put on one boat; the Rohingya were put on another. After about a half hour at sea, the captain cut the engine. “We thought the engine had stalled or broke down,” said Basser. “The captain told us we could not go back to Myanmar, that we had been sold by the immigration and police,” he added.

Mohamed and Basser, too, escaped after being brought to an island near mainland Thailand.

Until now, the Thai government has denied official complicity in the smuggling or trafficking of Rohingya. But in a break with that position, Chatchawal said Thai officials might have received money previously in exchange for Rohingya, but not anymore. “In the past, and I stress in the past, there may have been cases of officials taking payments for handing over migrants to boats,” he said. “I am not ruling it out, but I don’t know of any specific cases recently.”

He said it was possible the Rohingya were intercepted by brokers and never made it to Myanmar. “Once they’ve crossed that border, that red line in the sea, they are Myanmar’s responsibility,” he said.

He also admitted the camps uncovered by Reuters exist in breach of Thai laws. He referred to them as “temporary shelters” for a people who ultimately want to reach Malaysia. The smugglers who run the camps “extort money from Rohingya” but police don’t accept bribes from them, he said.

As for the trafficking way stations in Padang Besar and Sadao, Chatchawal said: “I do believe there could be more camps like these. They could be hidden deep in the jungle.”

- Reuters