Monday, August 30, 2010

Migrant workers in protest

More than 5,000 migrant workers of JCY Co. Ltd., an electronics factory in the Tebrau Industrial area of Johor Baru, protested near the workers' quarters over the negligence of their employer when a fellow Nepalese worker died of high fever while at work. This happened on 16th August when the employer did not allow him to be taken to hospital in time. It is also reported that another Nepalese worker also died on 4th August due to lack of timely treatment.

Migrant workers from Nepal, Myanmar, Vietnam, Bangladesh and India had united to register their strong protest over the death of their colleague in that factory. The workers had also highlighted the mistreatment by management, including low wages and no provision of healthcare facilities in the factory, which employs around 8,000 workers. About 200 Police and Federal Reserve Unit personnel were called by management to control the enraged workers. The determined workers put forward a four-point programme of demands, including a salary hike, in order to pressurise management into negotiating, as well as demanding that the Nepalese embassy intervene.

The three days protest ended in a victory for the workers. Management agreed to pay compensation of 10,000 Ringgit to the dead worker's family; increase the minimum monthly salary from 428 to 546 Ringgit; provide an ambulance service for emergency cases and on time treatment at a clinic on the factory premises.

The struggle revealed that when workers are united they can win their demands, even though the employers attempt to use differences in race, country and religion to ‘divide and conquer' workers. Recently, more and more migrant workers in Malaysia have bravely entered into struggle to fight for their rights.

This case of exploitation of migrant workers is only the tip of the iceberg in Malaysia. Most of the more than 3 million migrant workers (almost 10% of the Malaysian population) earn very low wages, work long hours and live and work in appalling conditions. According to the Nepalese embassy, during 2009 a total of 183 Nepalese workers in Malaysia lost their lives, and another 81 workers in the first six months of this year, mainly through illness and suicides. There are also many cases of deaths due to industrial accidents involving migrant workers.

In the meantime, the employers are using low wage migrant workers as a ‘threat' to discourage local workers from demanding high wages. The weak trade unions, with a right-wing reactionary and bureaucratic leadership, are not capable of playing a role in leading common struggles between local and migrant workers. At the same time, almost 90 percent of workers are not unionized, and the government's pro-employer labour and trade union law further undermines the rights of workers.

Although local workers are given a slightly better deal in wages, when compared to the high inflation rate their salary is not sufficient to manage their living expenses. Many are doing two jobs to meet their needs, and many even end up in the hands of loan sharks when they see no other way out. Even a recent government survey of about 1.3 million workers has shown that almost 34 per cent of them earned less than 700 Ringgit a month - below the poverty line of 720 Ringgit per month.

The multinationals, as well as the national capitalists, have been establishing their companies and factories in Malaysia to enlarge their profits. They do not care whether they employ local or foreign workers, as long as they can suck out the labour of workers to maximize their profits. Only workers can lend support to other workers for a common class struggle to liberate themselves from the viciousness of capitalism. An effort to build fighting trade unions, as well as a mass workers' party, is crucial towards achieving a society based on needs and genuine democracy without exploitation that is a socialist society.

Sunday, August 29, 2010

Suaram alarmed as Rela heads back to detention camps

By G Vinod

PETALING JAYA: Suaram is alarmed that the government has decided to allow Rela volunteers back into immigration detention centres.In a statement released today, the human rights group noted that Rela personnel were withdrawn from the detention camps last year following allegations that they had abused detainees.

Suaram was responding to reports that the government was planning to revamp the management of the detention centres and upgrade their facilities.

“We laud the government's move to revamp the facilities as many human rights organisations have raised concerns regarding the deplorable conditions and poor management of the detention centres.

“But we are concerned that the government is planning to bring back Rela officers into the detention camps,” said Suaram coordinator Temme Lee.

“We have repeatedly argued that Rela personnel should not be allowed to handle detention centres as they are not well-trained to handle migrants,” he said.

He also called on the government to stop treating illegal immigrants as if they were common criminals. Confining them to detention centres should be the last resort, he said.

“Their only guilt is flouting immigration laws,” Lee said. “If there is a need to detain them, perhaps the government can consider other alternatives like what Australia is doing — keeping the migrants in community detention premises.”

Welfare aspects ignored

Lee also said the proposed revamp did not take into account the welfare of detainees.

“It seems the government is only looking into the security aspects.”

“Suaram feels that adequate attention must also be given towards fulfilling the basic rights of the detainees, such as providing them clothing, clean water, bedding, proper healthcare and other basic needs.”

Suaram also urged the government to ensure that the detention centres comply with international human rights standards.

“The government can look into the United Nations' Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners and the UN Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment as a guide,” Lee said.

“We also urge the government to hold regular dialogues with civil society movements and other stakeholders on how to improve the management of immigration detention centres in the country.”

Source : http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/fmt-english/news/general/9696-suaram-alarmed-as-rela-heads-back-to-detention-camps

Saturday, August 28, 2010

Burmese Rank No. 1 in Malaysia Detention Center Deaths

Burmese Rank No. 1 in Malaysia Detention Center Deaths By LAWI WENG Friday, July 30, 2010


Thirty-two Burmese detainees died while in custody in Immigration Detention Center in Malaysia, the highest number of foreign detainee deaths, according to Malaysia's minister of home affairs.

Minister of Home Affairs Hishammuddin Tun Hussein said a total of 78 foreign detainees died during 2005 to 2009 in Immigration Detention Centers.

The foreign detainees included citizens from Burma, Indonesia, India, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Vietnam, Thailand, Nigeria, Togo, Pakistan, Liberia and the Philippines. The minister did not attribute the cause of death among the detainees.

In this photo taken Thursday, July 23, 2009, an immigration officer unlocks handcuffs from detainees at the Lenggeng Immigration center on the outskirts of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. (Photo:AP)

Speaking to The Irrawaddy on Thursday, Tenne Lee, a refugee coordinator from Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM) who works on human rights issues in Malaysia, said, “What we know about the cause of the deaths is that most of them died because of medical reasons.”


Tenne Lee said that there is not adequate medical treatment while detainees are in custody. Even if the detainees have medicine from a hospital when they enter a detention center, the medicine is confiscated, she said.

“We do monitor things if we get information about deaths. We do pressure the government, but we don't have power to do investigations,” she said. “It is hard to know the exact number of deaths. The government is not accountable.”

According to a press release from the Malaysian Bar Council in 2009, 1,300 foreigners died in detention centers during the past six years.

Some Burmese human rights activists in Malaysia say that the number of detainee deaths is much higher than acknowledged by the Ministry of Home Affairs.

Nai Roi Mon, who works with Mon detainees in Kuala Lumpur and is a member of the Mon Refugee office in Malaysia, said: “I doubt their numbers. As I remember, at least 100 Burmese died in detention centers during the past five years.”

He said that many of detainees died because they were denied medical treatment when needed.

There are about 500,000 Burmese migrants in Malaysia, legally and illegally. Burmese detainees are the largest group in detention centers.

There are 28 Immigration Detention Centers in Malaysia. Human rights advocates say there are constant complaints of inadequate food, water and unsanitary conditions. Detainees are not given clothing.

Advocates say that family members who try to bring cases to court are discouraged by governmental delay. There has never been a successful case of prosecution for negligence, said Tenne Lee. She said children are not separated from adults in detention centers.

According to a 2009 SUARAM report titled “Malaysia Civil and Political Rights Overview,” nine Burmese detainees died in detention centers from May to August last year due to an outbreak of Leptospirosis (an infectious disease caused by contaminated water or food which has been infected with rodent urine).

Human rights groups and civil society groups highlighted the outbreak of the disease in detention centers, but they say the government has been slow to respond.
Malaysia is ranked as one of the worst countries for refugees by the international watchdog, the US Committee for Refugees and Immigrants. Malaysia also ranks poorly among countries in meeting the minimum standards for the elimination of human trafficking, according to the US State Department.
http://www.irrawaddy.org/print_article.php?art_id=19095

Disability Rights Treaty Ratification an ‘Important Step’

Malaysia: Disability Rights Treaty Ratification an ‘Important Step’
Concerns Remain on Government’s Willingness to Enforce Convention Fully
(New York, August 17, 2010) – Malaysia’s ratification of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities can help bring real improvement in the lives of people with disabilities in Malaysia, Human Rights Watch said today. But Malaysia should withdraw its formal reservations to the treaty that will undermine its efforts to protect and promote those rights, Human Rights Watch said.
The Disability Rights Convention affirms broad protections for people with disabilities, including the rights to life, freedom from discrimination, equal recognition before the law, and access to justice, education, employment, and health. The treaty will go into effect in Malaysia on August 18, 2010.
“Malaysia has taken an important step to protect the rights of people with disabilities,” said Shantha Rau Barriga, disability rights researcher and advocate at Human Rights Watch. “But the convention should be seen as a springboard for changing Malaysian laws, policies, and practices that violate the rights of people with disabilities.”
While the Malaysian government has indicated plans to improve acceptance of people with disabilities into the mainstream, there are still problems with putting the plans into practice, Human Rights Watch said. Compliance with the 1984 law that mandates that public buildings be designed for accessibility is sporadic. In addition, a non-binding plan announced in 2009 to ensure that one percent of the government work force is reserved for persons with disabilities has not matched expectations.
The dropout rate for children with disabilities is a major concern, Human Rights Watch said. In part, this results from a lack of access to schools for children who use wheelchairs, for example, and in part from a lack of facilities, programs, and trained personnel to assist children with learning disabilities. The country’s education regulations even exclude the “non-educable” from schools.
Malaysia entered formal reservations to the Disability Rights Convention concerning the prohibition of torture and other ill-treatment (article 15) and the right to liberty of movement and nationality (article 18). It also made a declaration limiting the government’s legal application of the principles of non-discrimination and equality.
Human Rights Watch urged Malaysia to withdraw these reservations immediately and to ensure that anyone with disabilities in Malaysia has the full protection of all rights set out in the convention. Countries that have ratified the Disability Rights Convention should make formal objections to Malaysia’s reservations and declaration, Human Rights Watch said.
Malaysia’s reservations are especially problematic, Human Rights Watch said, because the government has yet to ratify other major human rights treaties that incorporate these rights, specifically the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. The prohibition against torture is one of the most basic under international law, permitting no exceptions. Malaysia has recently withdrawn a number of its reservations to the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) and the Convention on the Rights of the Child, but should remove all the remaining reservations, Human Rights Watch said.
“Malaysia’s reservations are troubling and send a terrible message to people with disabilities,” Barriga said. “What possible justification could Malaysia have for objecting to protecting persons with disabilities from torture or allowing them to move around the country?”
Human Rights Watch also urged Malaysia to sign and ratify the Optional Protocol to the Disability Rights Convention, which allows individuals to send complaints of human rights violations to an international monitoring body. At present, Malaysia’s Persons with Disabilities Act provides no mechanisms for redress, and expressly prohibits legal actions against the government for violating the rights of persons with disabilities.
“By ratifying the Disability Rights Convention, Malaysia made progress toward fulfilling one of its pledges as a member of the United Nations Human Rights Council to adopt more international human rights instruments,” Barriga said. “However, its reservations to the convention fall far short of honoring that pledge.”

For more Human Rights Watch reporting on Malaysia, please visit:

For more information, please contact:

In Bangkok, Phil Robertson (English, Thai): +66-85-060-8406 (mobile)
In New York, Shantha Rau Barriga (English, German): +;1-212-216-1823; or +1-917-5245 (mobile)
In New York, Mickey Spiegel (English): +;1-212-216-1229; or +;1-917-968-9937 (mobile)

Changes to Immigration Detention Centres Must Respect Human Rights

Press Statement: 26 August 2010

Changes to Immigration Detention Centres Must Respect Human Rights

SUARAM welcomes the Malaysian Government’s move to review the management and upgrade the facilities of Immigration Detention Centres. National and international human rights organisations have long raised concerns regarding the deplorable conditions and poor management of detention centres but up until now, the Government has repeatedly denied such claims. By acknowledging the dire conditions at the detention centres, it stands to reason that the Government can no longer ignore this issue.

It was announced that the Government intends to revamp the detention centres within the next 3 months. However, SUARAM is concerned about some aspects of the announced plans which are as follows:

1.      Reinstating RELA to manage security
In November 2007, when the management of immigration detention centres were transferred from the Prisons Department to the Immigration Department, RELA personnel were deployed as the Immigration Department lacked personnel. Mid-2009 onwards, RELA personnel were withdrawn from the detention centres. During the period that RELA assisted in managing the detention centres, there were many allegations of poor treatment of detainees by RELA personnel, including verbal, psychological and physical abuse.

SUARAM is disappointed that the Government has made a u-turn on this decision by now including RELA in the management of the detention centres again. We have repeatedly argued that RELA personnel should not be given powers to act as law enforcement agencies as they do not have adequate training.

2.      Explore alternatives to detention
As most migrants detained in immigration detention centres are detained for flouting immigration laws and are not criminals, detention should be used as a last resort. If there is a need for them to be held for processing purposes, alternatives to detention must be explored such as those currently practiced in Australia, including community detention or case management[1].

Detention should not be the first option particularly when it comes to refugees, asylum seekers, stateless persons, children and trafficked victims. Refugees, asylum seekers, stateless persons and trafficked victims cannot be deported, and as such should be released.

3.      Security should not be the main concern
Based on news reports, it seems like the Government is more concerned about the security aspect of immigration detention centres rather than the welfare of the detainees. SUARAM is of the view that adequate attention must be given to fulfilling the basic rights of the detainees. These include providing clothing, bedding, adequate clean water, sufficient diet, on-site access to health care, personal sanitary supplies, and daily activities.

In line with these serious concerns, SUARAM calls on the Government to:
·         Stop the use of RELA in the management of immigration detention centres.
·         Stop the detention of refugees, asylum seekers, stateless persons, trafficked victims and children.
·         Explore alternatives to detention as a method to minimise the use of detention as first resort for those who have violated immigration laws.
·         Ensure that the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for the management of immigration detention centres complies with international human rights standards such as the UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners and the UN Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment.
·         Hold regular consultations with civil society and stakeholders to openly discuss and receive recommendations on how to improve the management of immigration detention centres.


Released by,

Temme Lee
Coordinator

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Malaysia’s invisible blockade

 Monday, 23 August 2010
Don’t weep for Gaza only; weep also for refugees and migrants in Malaysia, says Angeline Loh.

In the aftermath of the Israeli marine forces’ attack on the Turkish humanitarian vessel 40 miles into international waters, which resulted in 10 activists being killed, widespread outrage was expressed by the Malaysian government, civil society organisations, and political parties alike.

Street protests were held expressing outrage at Israeli actions and sympathy for the Palestinians in Gaza. Rosmah Mansor, wife of Prime Minister Najib Razak, was reported to have shed tears when handing over US$45,000 to the Turkish Ambassador for the families of the nine Turkish activists killed in this tragic incident (theSun, 10 June 2010).

Whiles Palestinians blockaded in Gaza deserve sympathy and support for the violations of their human rights by the Israeli occupiers of their land with humanitarian aid from the international community, the dire situation of refugees, asylum seekers and undocumented migrants in Malaysia remains little changed.

Regardless of nationality, country of origin and religion, refugees - fleeing from wars, persecution and other human rights violations in their own countries - seeking a safe haven in Malaysia continue to live in fear and uncertainty.

The reasons for this have been well documented over the past few years and have been the subject of numerous civil society press statements and media comment, including statements by the UN refugee agency.

Despite the obviously difficult position in which refugees and asylum seekers find themselves in this country - being legally unrecognised by Malaysian law, even if they possess genuine UNHCR documentation - they have been shown virtually no sympathy by the Government.

Refugee communities continue to struggle to survive without legal rights to work to sustain themselves and their families here. Refugee children, like children of migrant workers, continue to be denied the right to a proper education in local schools.

Access to medical treatment and healthcare is difficult and unaffordable as migrants and refugees are expected to pay expatriate fees (even if discounted) for medical services at government hospitals, regardless of their economic situation. Refugees are even denied the ability to be self-reliant as they are prohibited from starting their own  small business ventures to earn a living to support their families.

Refugees, asylum seekers and migrant workers, particularly those entering the country undocumented may fall prey to harassment and extortion by corrupt security enforcers, service sector personnel, local criminal syndicates and human traffickers.

There is no guarantee of safety from arrest and detention in immigration detention camps (IDCs), prisons or lock-ups around the country. No protection from disruption and tragedy in their daily lives. They are forced to live one day at a time from day to day, never being certain what will happen the next day.

Migrants, refugees and asylum seekers continue to remain at the top of the Home Affairs Ministry list of  national security threats, second only to drug trafficking.


Invisible blockade of undocumented migrants and refugees


The restrictions imposed on migrants, refugees and asylum seekers in Malaysia seem akin to the concrete walls, restriction of movement, checkpoints, searches, arrests, imprisonment and harassment faced by the Palestinians in Gaza. The only difference is that this blockade of refugees, asylum seekers and undocumented migrants is invisible to most Malaysian citizens.

Public ignorance of the reasons refugees come to our country and how people become refugees is another wall in the refugee/migrant maze that serves to isolate and effectively prevent acceptance of their existence and presence in our society. This ignorance is aggravated by official implication that these legally unrecognised and undocumented persons are ‘criminals’ or ‘potential criminals’.

Such lack of awareness and the mental block of refugees and their circumstances is constantly “hammered” into the Malaysian public psyche by government ministers who allege that refugees coming to Malaysia are economic migrants (Soalan No. 49 Pertanyaan Bagi Jawab Lisan Dewan Rakyat Mesyuarat, Second sitting, Third term, 12 th Parliamen Kedua Belas 2010).

More walls are added to the invisible blockade through the use of the mainstream media, which often makes ‘examples’ of foreigners seen to be involved in any criminal activity even if these foreigners may be victims of human trafficking. This is seen from the frequent media coverage of police raids on vice dens in Kuala Lumpur and other large cities in the country.

Reports of such raids are presented in considerably sordid detail and television cameras are allowed to take footage within the raided premises exposing foreign workers employed by operators of these illegal joints to public glare (RTM and ntv7 news reports).

Similarly, a raid was carried out in full public glare at a shopping mall in Pulau Tikus, Penang on a Sunday afternoon, 18 July 2010. Foreigners were rounded up and made to sit outside by the pavement in full public view while their  documents were checked by immigration officials, working together with Rela and police personnels (oral information from an eye-witness).

It appears to be an official habit in Malaysia to mete out humiliation before even knowing what the crime committed is. The innocent are stigmatised without evidence and some are subjected to public embarrassment for no good reason at all. The underlying official attitude seems to be ‘guilty until proven innocent’ dismissing any presumption of innocence that may justly apply. In the case of undocumented migrants, refugees and asylum seekers the misapplication is even worse as the offence is not criminal in the real sense, but only an administrative one of lacking documents or any means of legal proof of identification. 

This kind of humiliation has become a malpractice affecting, not only foreigners but also unfortunate Malaysian citizens who happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, who apparently pose some sort of political threat to the powers-that-be or belong to marginalised ethnic communities.

The official entrenchment of xenophobia against any foreigner, especially impoverished and defenseless refugees, asylum seekers and undocumented migrants raises another wall in the  ‘blockade’ of this category of people.

Some authorities apparently prefer the use of racism and xenophobia over a better immigration control system that might deal with current global migration problems more justly, effectively and humanely.

Like the Palestinians in the Occupied Territories, refugees, asylum seekers and migrants here live in uncertainty, insecurity and fear in a very obvious, yet paradoxically invisible blockade.

It is for them also that we should also weep. Perhaps, we should also shed a tear for our own wilful blindness to their victimization and suffering that concretely and pitilessly supports the invisible blockading of the marginalised peoples in our society.
Angeline Loh is an Aliran exco member.

Source : http://www.aliran.com

    PROTECTING THE PSYCHOSOCIAL WELLBEING OF REFUGEE YOUTH

     PROTECTING THE PSYCHOSOCIAL WELLBEING OF REFUGEE YOUTH
    There are currently 7,178 registered refugee ‘youths’ between the age 13 to 18, making up 9% of the refugee population. For the purposes of this paper, refugee youth were seen as all those between the ages of 13-18 and of Chin, Rohingya, Afghan, Somali and Sri Lankan origin. This amounts to 4724 individuals. The majority of this sample reside within the Klang Valley.
    The paper sought ways in which to improve the psychosocial wellbeing of refugee youth. The chosen topics of investigation are areas in which proper assistance could boost the components that make up an individual’s psychosocial wellbeing. These components are explained below. 
    Psychosocial wellbeing refers to an individual’s psychological development and condition that results from their interaction with their social environment.
    To maintain positive psychosocial wellbeing, one must rely on your resources of:
    Human capacity – individuals’ physical and mental strengths and values – knowledge, capacity and skills.
    Social ecology – social connections and support systems, cohesive relationships and social equilibriums.
    Culture and Values – maintenance of cultural norms and values within a society - that influence the individual and social aspects of daily life.
    Also, one must have a series of external factors in place, to provide stability and security. Proper psychological development, through interaction with the social environment, can then take place:
    External factors:
    The maintenance of:
    e.g. livelihood + shelter + physical security  
    Areas of study thus became:
    • HEALTH – PHYSICAL + MENTAL

    • LIVELIHOOD

    • LEGAL/SECURITY

    • SGBV

    • SOCIAL SPACES

    PHYSICAL HEALTH:
    Overview of youth situation:
    - Good condition (relative) but concerns over:
    • Hygiene issues
    •   SRH awareness
    •   Substance abuse

    Problems of assistance:
    • Youngsters unable to access health services
    • Lack of understanding of physical health issues
    • Lack of information on services
    • Stigma over SRH

    Recommendations:
    • Greater focus on SRH education
    • Specific assessments of youth popn.
    • Hygiene education
    • Info leaflets in youth-frequented locations

    MENTAL HEALTH:
    Overview of youth situation:
    • Official statistics –
          little suggestion of poor mental health/psychological disorders
    • Interviews with youth, in 1-on-1, focus groups, CBPs reveal youth population with pressing anxieties and resultant behavioural symptoms. UNHCR staff also suggest a greater existence of psychological distress than statistics suggest.

      Added mental pressures on youth:
    • Increasing responsibility within the family
    • Body changes
    • Unwelcoming peer environment
    • Lack of safe leisure space
    • Substance abuse

        General concerns:
    • Resettlement, Traumas, Loneliness, Idleness

      Problems of assistance:
    • Little concept of mental health
    • Greater stigma amongst youth
    • Community centres lack will+expertise to refer/handle youth
    • Youths access community centres less
    • Access to BID limited
    • Articulation between counsellor to youth
    • Trust between counsellor to youth
    • Counselling largely a basic “reality check”
    • Few referrals for psychotherapy/psychiatry
    • Lack of child-training amongst counsellors

    Recommendations:
    • BID drop-in days
    • Psychosocial education classes
    • Capacity training amongst CBOs
    • Psychohealth services to reflect refugee culture
    • Peer counsellors
    • Post-detention psychological assessments
    • Greater access to psychotherapy or other cathartic therapies
    • ACTS kids-only days
    • UNHCR psychological profiling of youth population

      LIVELIHOOD:
    Dangers faced at work:
    • Exploitative employers
    • Informing to authorities
    • Verbal and physical abuse
    • Physical injury

    Motivations toward job-seeking:
    • Financial pressures on family
    • Family expectations of youth
    • UASCs self-supporting or supporting host
    • Simply seeking activity

    Problems of assistance:
    • Dilemma of education vs employment
    • No guarantees of jobs after training
    • Youths less employable
    • Youths display less realistic expectations

      Recommendations:
    • Livelihood-youth programmes designed to provide:
      • Education in the nature of refugee employment in Malaysia, including the dangers faced and appropriate handling methods.
      • Realistic expectations of employment
      • Understanding that they may be in Malaysia for long-term

    LEGAL/SECURITY
    Overview of youth situation:
    Major causes of detention:
    • Begging
    • Theft, gang fights, gang robberies, drug offences, working in gaming centres
    • Immigration offences

    Major threats to youth:
      • Job abuses - Exploitative employers, Informing to authorities, verbal and physical abuse, physical injury

    However, numbers of youth in detention and those reporting crimes are low. Reasons for this include:
      • Police leniency
      • Failure to report arrest/detention
      • Lack of will to inform OPI on crimes against self

    Problems of assistance:
    • Poor statistical understanding of crime problem
    • Expectations of release held by youth
    • Standardised debrief
    • Debriefs not given
    • Youths unable to reach OPI to report crimes
    • Youths see OPI as powerless

      Recommendations:
    • OPI with CDU – working with communities:
      • Highlight youth crimes and devise strategies with CBOs to prevent them
      • Reiterate importance of informing to OPI
      • Disseminate info on best practice for youth when arrested/detained
        • Statistics system  - allowing user to breakdown by age, type of crime, community, length of detention etc
        • Youth-oriented debrief including:
           - Psychological assessment
            - Different approach 
      SGBV
      Overview of youth situation:
    • 10.1% of UNHCR-reported victims in 2009 were youth – (22 cases)
    • Mostly DOVI

      Reasons for under-reporting amongst youth:
    • Fear reactions of peers
    • Need assistance to contact authorities
    • Less awareness of SGBV
    • Being a witness not recognised as SGBV
    • Communities not always supportive
    • Parents want them to stay in marriage
    • Youth wives especially fear life after marriage

       Problems of assistance: 
    • Lack of reporting of SGBV
    • Not all UNHCR staff trained to spot SGBV
      Medical assistance - problems
    • Currently only ACTS offering medical assistance to SGBV survivors
    • There is no SOP on how to manage the SGBV cases in the clinic
    • Lack of awareness on SGBV issues among the front line staff

      Counselling - problems
    • Only one partner (WAO) offers counselling services – only for female SGBV survivors.
    • Professional SGBV counselling for male survivors is not in place.
    • Lack of awareness on SGBV among interpreters.
    • Major problem – victims often do not see the point of counselling

      Shelter programme - problems
    • Shelter home programme not available for male SGBV survivors.
    • Highly dependent on the sole partner.
    • Turn over of staff in the partner organisation (during the reporting months) has affected the programme.

      Prevention: Awareness/training on SGBV - problems
    • Lack of partners skilled in conducting community-based awareness programmes on SGBV.
    • Need targeted awareness programme focusing on SGBV incidents that are reported in Malaysia e.g. domestic violence and children abuse/sexual abuse.
    • Limited funding available to support SGBV awareness programmes.
    • Difficult to devise peer-training schemes, because of differing SGBV concerns amongst different communities.

      Recommendations:
    • Increase formal education amongst girls
    • Introduce gender education in to refugee education – at all age levels
    • Create greater formal community structures amongst Rohingya

      SOCIAL SPACES
      Overview of youth situation:
    • Often overlooked problem for youth
    • Creates:
      • Loneliness + lack of peer interaction
      • Idleness – harmful behaviour
      • Lack of peer support
      • Weaker community ties

      Little work from UNHCR in this area. A new pilot project has been started within CDU.
      Recommendations:
    • Create new social spaces:
      • Community lead
      • 1 adult staff in attendance – trained
      • Well publicised within communities
      • Emphasis on leisure + individual freedom
      • Youth only
      • Maximum inclusivity, open all hours

    PROTECTING THE PSYCHOSOCIAL WELLBEING OF REFUGEE YOUTH

     PROTECTING THE PSYCHOSOCIAL WELLBEING OF REFUGEE YOUTH
    There are currently 7,178 registered refugee ‘youths’ between the age 13 to 18, making up 9% of the refugee population. For the purposes of this paper, refugee youth were seen as all those between the ages of 13-18 and of Chin, Rohingya, Afghan, Somali and Sri Lankan origin. This amounts to 4724 individuals. The majority of this sample reside within the Klang Valley.
    The paper sought ways in which to improve the psychosocial wellbeing of refugee youth. The chosen topics of investigation are areas in which proper assistance could boost the components that make up an individual’s psychosocial wellbeing. These components are explained below. 
    Psychosocial wellbeing refers to an individual’s psychological development and condition that results from their interaction with their social environment.
    To maintain positive psychosocial wellbeing, one must rely on your resources of:
    Human capacity – individuals’ physical and mental strengths and values – knowledge, capacity and skills.
    Social ecology – social connections and support systems, cohesive relationships and social equilibriums.
    Culture and Values – maintenance of cultural norms and values within a society - that influence the individual and social aspects of daily life.
    Also, one must have a series of external factors in place, to provide stability and security. Proper psychological development, through interaction with the social environment, can then take place:
    External factors:
    The maintenance of:
    e.g. livelihood + shelter + physical security  
    Areas of study thus became:
    • HEALTH – PHYSICAL + MENTAL

    • LIVELIHOOD

    • LEGAL/SECURITY

    • SGBV

    • SOCIAL SPACES

    PHYSICAL HEALTH:
    Overview of youth situation:
    - Good condition (relative) but concerns over:
    • Hygiene issues
    •   SRH awareness
    •   Substance abuse

    Problems of assistance:
    • Youngsters unable to access health services
    • Lack of understanding of physical health issues
    • Lack of information on services
    • Stigma over SRH

    Recommendations:
    • Greater focus on SRH education
    • Specific assessments of youth popn.
    • Hygiene education
    • Info leaflets in youth-frequented locations

    MENTAL HEALTH:
    Overview of youth situation:
    • Official statistics –
          little suggestion of poor mental health/psychological disorders
    • Interviews with youth, in 1-on-1, focus groups, CBPs reveal youth population with pressing anxieties and resultant behavioural symptoms. UNHCR staff also suggest a greater existence of psychological distress than statistics suggest.

      Added mental pressures on youth:
    • Increasing responsibility within the family
    • Body changes
    • Unwelcoming peer environment
    • Lack of safe leisure space
    • Substance abuse

        General concerns:
    • Resettlement, Traumas, Loneliness, Idleness

      Problems of assistance:
    • Little concept of mental health
    • Greater stigma amongst youth
    • Community centres lack will+expertise to refer/handle youth
    • Youths access community centres less
    • Access to BID limited
    • Articulation between counsellor to youth
    • Trust between counsellor to youth
    • Counselling largely a basic “reality check”
    • Few referrals for psychotherapy/psychiatry
    • Lack of child-training amongst counsellors

    Recommendations:
    • BID drop-in days
    • Psychosocial education classes
    • Capacity training amongst CBOs
    • Psychohealth services to reflect refugee culture
    • Peer counsellors
    • Post-detention psychological assessments
    • Greater access to psychotherapy or other cathartic therapies
    • ACTS kids-only days
    • UNHCR psychological profiling of youth population

      LIVELIHOOD:
    Dangers faced at work:
    • Exploitative employers
    • Informing to authorities
    • Verbal and physical abuse
    • Physical injury

    Motivations toward job-seeking:
    • Financial pressures on family
    • Family expectations of youth
    • UASCs self-supporting or supporting host
    • Simply seeking activity

    Problems of assistance:
    • Dilemma of education vs employment
    • No guarantees of jobs after training
    • Youths less employable
    • Youths display less realistic expectations

      Recommendations:
    • Livelihood-youth programmes designed to provide:
      • Education in the nature of refugee employment in Malaysia, including the dangers faced and appropriate handling methods.
      • Realistic expectations of employment
      • Understanding that they may be in Malaysia for long-term

    LEGAL/SECURITY
    Overview of youth situation:
    Major causes of detention:
    • Begging
    • Theft, gang fights, gang robberies, drug offences, working in gaming centres
    • Immigration offences

    Major threats to youth:
      • Job abuses - Exploitative employers, Informing to authorities, verbal and physical abuse, physical injury

    However, numbers of youth in detention and those reporting crimes are low. Reasons for this include:
      • Police leniency
      • Failure to report arrest/detention
      • Lack of will to inform OPI on crimes against self

    Problems of assistance:
    • Poor statistical understanding of crime problem
    • Expectations of release held by youth
    • Standardised debrief
    • Debriefs not given
    • Youths unable to reach OPI to report crimes
    • Youths see OPI as powerless

      Recommendations:
    • OPI with CDU – working with communities:
      • Highlight youth crimes and devise strategies with CBOs to prevent them
      • Reiterate importance of informing to OPI
      • Disseminate info on best practice for youth when arrested/detained
        • Statistics system  - allowing user to breakdown by age, type of crime, community, length of detention etc
        • Youth-oriented debrief including:
           - Psychological assessment
            - Different approach 
      SGBV
      Overview of youth situation:
    • 10.1% of UNHCR-reported victims in 2009 were youth – (22 cases)
    • Mostly DOVI

      Reasons for under-reporting amongst youth:
    • Fear reactions of peers
    • Need assistance to contact authorities
    • Less awareness of SGBV
    • Being a witness not recognised as SGBV
    • Communities not always supportive
    • Parents want them to stay in marriage
    • Youth wives especially fear life after marriage

       Problems of assistance: 
    • Lack of reporting of SGBV
    • Not all UNHCR staff trained to spot SGBV
      Medical assistance - problems
    • Currently only ACTS offering medical assistance to SGBV survivors
    • There is no SOP on how to manage the SGBV cases in the clinic
    • Lack of awareness on SGBV issues among the front line staff

      Counselling - problems
    • Only one partner (WAO) offers counselling services – only for female SGBV survivors.
    • Professional SGBV counselling for male survivors is not in place.
    • Lack of awareness on SGBV among interpreters.
    • Major problem – victims often do not see the point of counselling

      Shelter programme - problems
    • Shelter home programme not available for male SGBV survivors.
    • Highly dependent on the sole partner.
    • Turn over of staff in the partner organisation (during the reporting months) has affected the programme.

      Prevention: Awareness/training on SGBV - problems
    • Lack of partners skilled in conducting community-based awareness programmes on SGBV.
    • Need targeted awareness programme focusing on SGBV incidents that are reported in Malaysia e.g. domestic violence and children abuse/sexual abuse.
    • Limited funding available to support SGBV awareness programmes.
    • Difficult to devise peer-training schemes, because of differing SGBV concerns amongst different communities.

      Recommendations:
    • Increase formal education amongst girls
    • Introduce gender education in to refugee education – at all age levels
    • Create greater formal community structures amongst Rohingya

      SOCIAL SPACES
      Overview of youth situation:
    • Often overlooked problem for youth
    • Creates:
      • Loneliness + lack of peer interaction
      • Idleness – harmful behaviour
      • Lack of peer support
      • Weaker community ties

      Little work from UNHCR in this area. A new pilot project has been started within CDU.
      Recommendations:
    • Create new social spaces:
      • Community lead
      • 1 adult staff in attendance – trained
      • Well publicised within communities
      • Emphasis on leisure + individual freedom
      • Youth only
      • Maximum inclusivity, open all hours